Pennsylvania House Bill HB90

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/14/25
• Refer: 1/14/25

Caption

In public assistance, further providing for verification of eligibility.

Impact

The implications of HB 90 are considerable. By enforcing tighter guidelines around eligibility and support verification, the bill seeks to reduce instances where children are deprived of medical assistance due to private agreements that circumvent state requirements. Exceptions to the cooperativity clause are included for cases of domestic violence, ensuring that victims are not further harmed or placed in volatile situations while seeking support. This dual approach aims to both protect children and foster accountability among parents regarding their support responsibilities.

Summary

House Bill 90 aims to amend existing welfare laws in Pennsylvania by introducing more stringent verification processes for medical support in public assistance cases. Specifically, the bill mandates that all applicants and recipients of medical assistance must cooperate with the state in securing medical support from the noncustodial parent of a child. This inclusion is intended to ensure that children receive necessary medical support without any delays, thereby safeguarding their welfare and health needs. The bill emphasizes that private agreements between custodial and noncustodial parents will not be accepted if they compromise the child’s access to medical support that is otherwise available under state laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 90 appears largely supportive, particularly among advocates for child welfare and assistance programs. Proponents argue that the bill is a step in the right direction for ensuring that children receive the necessary medical support they are entitled to. However, some concerns may arise, particularly regarding the parameters set for victim exceptions and the potential burden on custodial parents who may feel pressured to cooperate with the department's verification processes. This dynamic may lead to varied reactions depending on individual circumstances, particularly for those in sensitive situations like domestic violence.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the operationalization of the verification process and how exemptions for domestic violence cases will be effectively evaluated. There are concerns that the stipulated requirements could inadvertently place custodial parents, especially those fleeing abusive situations, in jeopardy by compelling them to pursue verification from noncustodial parents. Ensuring that the implementation of this bill provides adequate protection for these vulnerable groups will be essential in evaluating its overall success and reception.