Pennsylvania House Bill HB937

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/17/25
• Refer: 3/17/25
• Refer: 5/12/25
• Report Pass: 5/14/25
• Engrossed: 5/14/25
• Refer: 5/22/25

Caption

In coroner, further providing for fees for reports.

Impact

This legislation potentially alters how local governments manage funds regarding coroner services. The fees collected by the coroner's office are required to be accounted for and submitted to the county treasurer. These funds are designated for defraying the expenses associated with the training of coroner personnel, thereby improving the operational efficiency and expertise of coroners within the state.

Summary

House Bill 937 amends Title 16 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, specifically focusing on the fees that coroners charge for various reports. The bill outlines a standard fee structure where the coroner shall charge $500 for an autopsy report, $100 for a toxicology report, and other set fees for different types of reports. This regulation aims to streamline the costs associated with obtaining these critical documents while ensuring that expenses incurred by the coroner's office are managed effectively.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding HB 937 appears to be positive among legislative members, especially since it facilitates a clear and standardized fee structure for coroners' reports. The bill was met with unanimous support during its voting process, indicating widespread agreement on the necessity of establishing these regulations for better financial governance within coroner offices.

Contention

While the bill seems to have garnered support, potential points of contention may arise concerning the flexibility of fees charged. The strict fee caps may not accommodate local variations in cost of service across different counties, possibly leading to debates regarding fairness and adequacy of resources in smaller counties with different operational costs. Furthermore, the reasoning behind the flat fees for next-of-kin requests may also lead to scrutiny if families feel that their unique situations aren’t adequately considered.