Urging the Congress of the United States to amend 17 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 107 to protect creative workers against displacement by artificial intelligence technology.
If implemented, this resolution could lead to significant changes in how copyright law is applied to works created by AI, thereby reshaping the landscape of intellectual property protections in the creative sectors. One of the key proposals is to stipulate that only works created primarily by humans are eligible for copyright. Thus, any work significantly produced by AI could be rendered public domain, altering ownership and usage rights for many creators who use AI tools in their creative processes.
House Resolution 81 urges the United States Congress to amend sections 102 and 107 of Title 17 of the U.S. Code to protect creative workers from displacement caused by advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technology. It highlights the rapid progress of AI in producing various forms of creative work, including writing, art, music, and coding, raising concerns over the future livelihood of individuals employed in creative industries. The resolution seeks to proactively address these challenges by recommending specific legal changes that clarify the bounds of copyright in the face of these technological developments.
The sentiment around HR81 appears to be largely supportive among groups advocating for the rights of creative workers, who view it as a necessary measure to safeguard their employment and creative outputs against the encroaching influence of AI. However, there may be some contention from sectors that utilize AI technologies, including businesses and tech companies, who may perceive these proposed changes as restrictive and counterproductive to innovation in the field, creating divergent viewpoints on the intersection of technology and creative autonomy.
Notable points of contention could emerge regarding the proposed amendments, particularly the definition of 'creative work' and the implications of categorizing AI-generated outputs as public domain. This could spark debates over the fairness of such classifications and the potential loss of earnings for creators. Additionally, the resolution's call for stricter limitations on the use of AI in creating derivative works from existing copyrighted materials may create friction between traditional creative industries and rapidly evolving technological advancements.