Pennsylvania House Bill HR87

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/25
• Refer: 2/21/25

Caption

Directing the Joint State Government Commission to conduct a study reviewing the risk to critical infrastructure from foreign purchases of critical infrastructure assets and adjacent land in this Commonwealth.

Impact

The resolution suggests that current state protocols may not adequately protect critical infrastructure from foreign intervention, indicating a potential gap in legislative measures meant to secure assets vital to the Commonwealth. The study will examine the types of infrastructure requiring additional safeguards and consider best practices implemented by other states to enhance security and vulnerability assessments against foreign investments. It is anticipated that the findings may influence future legislative actions focusing on infrastructure protection and foreign investments.

Summary

House Resolution 87 (HR87) directs the Joint State Government Commission to conduct a study to assess the risk to critical infrastructure from foreign purchases of vital infrastructure assets and adjacent lands within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This resolution emerges in response to growing concerns related to cybersecurity threats and the increasing vulnerability of infrastructure to foreign entities. Citing instances of cyber attacks, HR87 seeks to proactively address potential risks associated with foreign acquisitions and to devise better safeguards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR87 is largely precautionary, driven by recent cybersecurity incidents that have sparked alarm regarding national security. Supporters of the resolution emphasize the need to protect state infrastructure, aligning with broader interests in maintaining operational security and addressing vulnerabilities. However, potential opposition might arise around the mechanisms of reporting and regulation that may be implemented as methods to mitigate these risks, which could lead to debates on the appropriateness of state intervention versus free market principles.

Contention

If the study reveals considerable risks associated with foreign purchases, there might arise contention surrounding the implementation of stricter controls on foreign investments in critical infrastructure. This could encompass discussions on whether adopting a CFIUS-like process at the state level is beneficial or if such a move would stifle economic opportunities. The resolution raises important questions about balancing security needs with economic growth, particularly in a landscape where foreign investment plays a vital role in development.