Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB340

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25

Caption

In medical professional liability, further providing for definitions and for expert qualifications.

Summary

Senate Bill 340 seeks to amend the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (Mcare) Act, specifically focusing on clarifying the requirements for expert testimony in medical professional liability cases. It introduces a more stringent set of qualifications that experts must meet to provide medical opinions or statements that support a certificate of merit. This aims to enhance the credibility of expert testimonies and ensure that such testimonies are grounded in adequate professional standards and knowledge, which may impact how medical malpractice cases are litigated in Pennsylvania. The bill stipulates that an expert must have sufficient education, training, and experience relevant to the specific medical field in question. Notably, it introduces the concept of a 'certificate of merit,' which necessitates that a licensed professional provide a written statement indicating that there is a reasonable probability that the defendant deviated from acceptable professional standards. This requirement ensures that claims are not frivolous and that they are supported by competent medical assessments before proceeding to trial. Discussions surrounding SB340 indicate a split sentiment among stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill will protect medical professionals from unjust litigation by requiring more rigorous standards for expert witnesses, ultimately fostering a fairer legal process. They believe this will help reduce frivolous medical malpractice lawsuits, which can lead to increased healthcare costs and may hinder the ability of providers to practice medicine without fear of litigation. Opponents, however, express concerns that the new requirements may unintentionally limit access to justice for patients who have legitimate claims against healthcare providers. Critics worry that the heightened standards for expert testimony could create barriers for patients seeking to hold healthcare providers accountable for negligence. This reflects a broader debate about the balance between protecting the medical profession and ensuring patient rights are upheld in the face of potential malpractice. In summary, SB340 represents a significant move in Pennsylvania's legislative landscape concerning medical liability by raising the bar for expert qualifications in lawsuits. While it aims to enhance the integrity of malpractice proceedings, the implications for patient access to legal recourse remain a contentious issue that reflects a fundamental tension in healthcare law.