Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB415

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/10/25

Caption

In computer offenses, providing for the offense of ransomware; and imposing duties on the Office of Administration.

Impact

If enacted, SB 415 will amend Title 18 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, particularly by integrating a subchapter focused on ransomware. This will signify a shift in state law, enhancing the legal tools available to combat cyber extortion. The bill requires Commonwealth agencies to take proactive measures against ransomware, such as developing guidelines for prevention and response. It also mandates reporting requirements for ransomware attacks, aimed at fostering timely public notification and a coordinated response to threats across different agencies.

Summary

Senate Bill 415 aims to address the rising threat of ransomware through the establishment of specific offenses related to ransomware attacks and the imposition of obligations on Commonwealth agencies. The bill's provisions define ransomware, enumerate prohibited actions such as possession and use of ransomware for extortion, and establish grading for offenses based on the monetary values involved. Among the key objectives is to implement a legal framework that empowers the state to prohibit and prosecute ransomware activities while ensuring local agencies can robustly respond to such threats.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 415 appears to be supportive among lawmakers who recognize the urgency of addressing cybersecurity challenges, particularly as ransomware incidents continue to jeopardize public and private operations. Proponents view the legislation as necessary for safeguarding state systems and data. However, there may be concerns related to the practical implementation of the measures, including the effectiveness of the proposed responses and the potential burden on state agencies to comply with the new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 415 involve the balance between enforcing strict penalties for ransomware offenses and ensuring that agencies can navigate the complexities of cybersecurity without being hindered by bureaucratic red tape. Critics might argue that while the intent is to create strong deterrents for cybercriminals, the legislation should also consider the realities of ransomware attacks, which often require immediate and adaptable responses that can be hampered by rigid compliance structures.