Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB44

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/23/25
• Refer: 7/23/25

Caption

In human trafficking, further providing for definitions and providing for victim determination statement and for State Human Trafficking Resource Coordinator; and, in licensing of drivers, providing for restoration of operating privilege for victims of human trafficking.

Impact

Should SB44 be enacted, it will amend Titles 18 and 75 of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes, which govern criminal offenses and vehicle regulations. By allowing victims to petition for the restoration of their operating privileges based on their victim status, the bill seeks to alleviate additional burdens faced by individuals affected by human trafficking. This legal recognition is likely to empower victims and facilitate their reintegration into society by removing barriers that can hinder their mobility and independence.

Summary

Senate Bill 44 (SB44) aims to enhance provisions related to human trafficking victims in Pennsylvania. Specifically, the bill introduces a process for issuing a 'victim determination statement,' allowing individuals identified as victims of human trafficking to restore their driving privileges that may have been suspended or revoked as a result of their victimization. This effort emphasizes the need to recognize the unique circumstances faced by victims and provides them a pathway to reclaim their rights and access necessary resources for rebuilding their lives.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB44 appears to be largely supportive, as it aligns with ongoing efforts to combat human trafficking and enhance support for victims. Advocates for victim rights and public safety organizations have expressed positive views on the measure, recognizing it as a necessary step towards justice and rehabilitation for victims. However, there may be some reservations from individuals concerned about the implementation of the bill and whether it adequately addresses the complexities of restoring driving privileges in a way that ensures public safety.

Contention

Despite the overall positivity, notable points of contention have emerged regarding the criteria for issuing victim determination statements and the potential implications for traffic safety. Some stakeholders may argue about the appropriateness of restoring driving privileges without stringent evaluations, while others might push for clearer guidelines to ensure that victims can access these provisions effectively. This balance between supporting victim rights and ensuring overall public safety will be a critical discussion point as SB44 progresses through the legislative process.