Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB612

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/6/25
• Refer: 6/6/25

Caption

Providing for the provision of disposable menstrual products.

Impact

The introduction of SB 612 is anticipated to have a significant impact on public health policies related to menstrual hygiene management across the state. By facilitating easier access to menstrual products, it aims to improve the quality of life for individuals experiencing menstruation, especially among vulnerable populations. This may also serve to foster educational environments and living situations that do not distract from academic success or personal dignity due to a lack of access to basic hygiene products. Furthermore, the act is intended to execute broader public health objectives by addressing menstrual health as a vital component of overall community wellness.

Summary

Senate Bill 612, also known as the Menstrual Equity Act, aims to ensure that disposable menstrual products are provided at no cost in various public and community facilities within Pennsylvania. This legislation is targeted at several key entities: shelters for temporary housing assistance, schools, colleges, correctional facilities, and various public department offices. By mandating that these entities make menstrual products available in a stigma-free manner, the bill seeks to address barriers to access for individuals who may otherwise struggle to obtain these essential items and promote menstrual health and hygiene.

Sentiment

Public sentiment around SB 612 is largely positive, especially among advocacy groups focused on women's health and rights. Many see this legislation as a progressive step toward eliminating period poverty and ensuring that all individuals have the means to manage their menstrual health without undue burden. However, there remains a segment of the population, including certain conservative advocacy groups, who voice concerns regarding the funding and regulation of such provisions, suggesting it might divert attention from other pressing health care issues or create unintended consequences in funding allocations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the financial implications for entities required to comply with the law and the logistics of implementation. Critics raise questions about the practicality of ensuring adequate supplies in all mandated locations and whether the state can sufficiently fund the initiative without compromising existing health programs. Proponents counter that access to menstrual products is a basic necessity that should be prioritized and that the cost implications will be offset by the benefits of improved public health outcomes.