Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB702

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25

Caption

Providing for telemedicine prohibited for medication safety.

Impact

The introduction of SB702 would specifically change the landscape of telehealth services in Pennsylvania, effectively disallowing healthcare providers from prescribing certain medications through telemedicine platforms. This amendment is expected to have a significant impact on healthcare delivery, as it creates stricter guidelines for how and when medications that require REMS can be prescribed. The bill aims to instill greater safety measures, but it may also complicate prescriptions for patients who rely on telemedicine due to physical or logistical constraints.

Summary

Senate Bill 702, introduced in the Pennsylvania General Assembly, aims to amend Title 35 (Health and Safety) of the Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes to prohibit the use of telemedicine in prescribing medications that are under the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS) by the FDA. The legislation intends to ensure that safety protocols are strictly followed in the administration of such medications, addressing concerns regarding the remote prescribing of potentially dangerous drugs. By restricting telemedicine in this context, the bill focuses on protecting patient safety during medication management.

Sentiment

Reactions to SB702 appear mixed, with proponents arguing that the bill is a necessary step to enhance patient safety, ensuring that medications with REMS are monitored and prescribed in a controlled environment. On the contrary, critics may see this as an unnecessary limitation on telemedicine, highlighting that many patients benefit from remote consultations. The sentiment around the bill underscores a larger debate about balancing patient safety with access to healthcare services.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential impact on patients who may have limited access to healthcare providers, especially in rural areas where telemedicine can be a vital resource. Also, the bill raises questions about the effectiveness of remote versus in-person consultations for prescribing high-risk medications. Advocates of telemedicine suggest that, with proper safeguards, remote prescriptions could still be viable without compromising patient safety.