Pennsylvania Senate Bill SB928

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/23/25
• Refer: 7/23/25

Caption

Amending the act of January 25, 1966 (1965 P.L.1542, No.538), entitled "An act creating a Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Council on the Arts, for the encouragement and development of the various arts, and making an appropriation therefor," establishing the Pennsylvania Film Producer Grant Program and the Pennsylvania Film Producer Grant Program Account; and making a repeal.

Impact

If enacted, SB928 will significantly impact state laws related to arts funding and economic development by instituting new mechanisms for financial support in the film industry. The establishment of the grant program is expected to foster a more vibrant local film sector, potentially leading to increased production activities. This, in turn, may stimulate job opportunities both directly within the film industry and indirectly in related fields such as tourism, hospitality, and local services.

Summary

SB928 focuses on establishing the Pennsylvania Film Producer Grant Program, aimed at encouraging and supporting film production within the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The bill seeks to create a dedicated fund, known as the Pennsylvania Film Producer Grant Program Account, to provide financial assistance to eligible film producers. This initiative is proposed to enhance the state's capacity to attract and retain film production, boosting local economies and job creation in the arts sector.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB928 appears generally positive among those in the arts community and economic development advocates. Supporters of the bill argue that it will bolster Pennsylvania's competitiveness in attracting film productions, as many neighboring states have already implemented similar programs. However, there may be concerns regarding the allocation of state funds and whether such investments will yield substantial returns in the form of economic growth and job creation.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB928 might include discussions on the adequacy of funding, the criteria for eligibility for grants, and accountability measures to ensure that the funds are utilized effectively. Some stakeholders may express apprehension about prioritizing arts funding in a budget that may need to address a variety of pressing state needs. The debate could highlight broader issues related to the role of government funding in the arts and the potential for favoritism or inefficiencies in grant distribution.