Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'municipal court'

Page 36 of 47
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

S/C on County & Regional Government Mar 24th, 2025 at 10:03 am

House S/C on County & Regional Government

Transcript Highlights:
  • What this bill does is designate the commissioners court as that authority.
  • This bill simply puts it in the hands of the Commissioners Court.
  • Your bill states that the County Commissioners Court has the authority to do that.
  • I mean, the plat that got filed for that land goes to the Commissioners Court; it gets regulated by the
  • ...was in the 1980s, I believe, invalidated by a court.
Summary: During this meeting, significant discussions revolved around essential bills, including HB1646, HB605, HB2379, and HB2115. HB1646, aimed at amending the Health and Safety Code, was presented as a means to enhance the operational efficiency of emergency service districts by raising the expenditure threshold for board approval from $2,000 to $50,000. Testimonies from emergency service officials were notably in favor of the bill, highlighting the improved response times and operational flexibility it would provide. On the other hand, HB605 sought to grant the Harris County Hospital District the authority to employ and commission its peace officers, tackling the increasing concerns of workplace violence in healthcare settings, which was addressed with urgency as it aimed at improving safety for both staff and patients. The bill was left pending to allow further considerations.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Finance (Part I) Jan 28th, 2025

Transcript Highlights:
  • **Courts**? **Campbell**? **Creighton**? **Flores**? **Coldhurst**? **Nichols**? **Paxton**?
  • level but have lost recently in the Texas Supreme Court against a dentist in North Texas.
  • We are going to be appealing the district court ruling.
  • We are going to be appealing the district court ruling.
  • We are going to be appealing the district court ruling.
Summary: The meeting of the committee primarily focused on the Office of the Attorney General, where General Ken Paxton and his staff presented budget recommendations, highlighting a proposed decrease of $163.9 million from the 2024-25 biennium budget. Discussions included essential service funding such as the Crime Victims Compensation Program, which is facing challenges due to revenue shortfalls and increased demand. The committee raised concerns regarding the method of finance swaps that impacted the overall budget, leading to a $38 million cut that the Attorney General’s office deemed an error. Representatives from the LBB were also questioned about the implications of these funding changes.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) May 8th, 2025

Senate State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • In 2023, however, the Court of Appeals decision...

  • It's a simple clarification, makes sense, and it's to ensure that the courts are following the law.
  • It's a correction of a misstep by the courts.
  • Whenever I'm being sanctioned in a federal court, that's scary because you're left up to the courts as
  • The courts, they have the very lawyerized statement on their website, but other than that...
Summary: The meeting held by the committee covered multiple critical bills focusing chiefly on the implications of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) related to child sexual abuse and the prohibition of state investments in companies tied to nations deemed as threats, such as China and Russia. Debate around HB34 emphasized the necessity of protecting Texas taxpayers and maintaining national security by avoiding investments in these adversarial nations. Additionally, House Bill 748 spurred poignant reflections and testimonies from abuse survivors aiming to combat the silencing effect of NDAs on victims. The legislators expressed a consensus on the urgency of these issues, particularly the need for Trey's Law, which aims to empower survivors and diminish the influence of NDAs that shield abusers from accountability.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • 10" data-time="54">Senate Bill 53 relates to certain notice requirements and filing requirements in court
  • Accordingly, laws created at the time required that when a court document was filed electronically, the
  • mental health court proceedings results in their being more
  • probate courts, whether they be Democrat or Republican, to.
  • , we can then have them subpoenaed and brought over to the court.
Summary: The meeting of the Senate Committee on Health and Human Services focused primarily on several key bills aimed at improving health care regulations and patient rights. Notably, Senator Hall introduced SB125, aiming to allow for direct and autologous blood donations, which sparked passionate debates among committee members and invited witnesses. Concerns were raised regarding the bill's implications for patient safety and the feasibility of the proposed 72-hour notice period for hospitals. Testimonies highlighted personal experiences, including that of the Lehrer family, advocating for the bill based on their children's health needs and the challenges faced due to current regulations. Conversely, several representatives from blood centers expressed opposition, cautioning that the bill could burden the blood donation system and adversely impact the quality of care for patients with special needs. Additionally, SB315 was present to address genetic privacy issues, aiming to grant Texans property rights over their DNA and genetic information. This bill also brought forth discussions about the ethical implications of genetic testing and data privacy in light of technological advancements. As the meeting progressed, representatives underscored the importance of balancing legislative intentions with practical outcomes, initiating further discussions on amendments and committee substitutes that would refine the proposed laws.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Public Education Apr 29th, 2025 at 10:04 am

House Public Education Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Supreme Court.
  • All over Washington, D.C., it's been cited over 500 times in court cases and the courts have pointed
  • It's a race to the Supreme Court in regards to how do we...
  • We really don't know, to the court. We're gonna...
  • This one's going to the courts, it's going to the Supremes.
Summary: The committee meeting was marked by significant discussions surrounding House Bill 4, which aims to reform the Texas public school assessment and accountability system. The bill proposes to eliminate the existing STAAR testing framework and replace it with a nationally norm-referenced assessment that emphasizes growth over year-end testing, promoting a more individualized learning experience for students. This shift was widely supported among educators and stakeholders, with many testifying in favor of creating a system that aligns better with both educational outcomes and community accountability. Notably, there were concerns raised about maintaining adequate oversight and integrity in the assessment process, as well as the timing of implementing these significant changes.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • In court, current maps are stated to be racially neutral.
  • No court order. This is a raw political power grab.
  • Federal courts have ruled GOP maps intentionally discriminatory numerous times.
  • Well, the Supreme Court, by the way, has not weighed in on the Pettaway case.
  • In 2021, Texas officials stood before the federal court in LULAC v.
Summary: The committee meeting primarily focused on public testimonies regarding the revised congressional redistricting plan. Numerous witnesses presented their concerns about how the proposed changes could potentially dilute representation for minority communities. A consistent theme throughout the testimonies was the fear that the redistricting effort was not aimed at serving constituents but rather at securing power for political parties. Several participants expressed a strong opposition to what they perceived as gerrymandering tactics, claiming they would negatively impact African-American and Hispanic communities in Texas. The meeting revealed a clear public sentiment against the redistricting proposals, with nearly all witnesses speaking out against the changes. The Chair noted an overwhelming number of testimonies opposing the redistricting, indicating a strong community response to the proposed changes and their implications on fair representation.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.

Senate Session (Part II) Jul 21st, 2025

Texas Senate Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • span marker="85" data-time="829"> By the Texas Office of Attorney General that they filed with the court
  • Are we under a court order to take up redistricting in a special session in mid-decade?
  • So the last maps, it was revealed in I think one of the court cases, perhaps, that a gentleman by the
  • The United States Supreme Court...
  • I think the court found that...
Summary: The meeting focused primarily on the congressional redistricting resolution prompted by the governor's request due to constitutional concerns flagged by the U.S. Department of Justice. Members discussed the procedural steps necessary to establish a special committee on congressional redistricting, emphasizing the need for transparency and public participation. Concerns were raised about the limited number of planned regional hearings and the implications for community input. A strong commitment to include public testimony through both in-person and virtual means was stated, ensuring that Texans can engage with the process regardless of their geographical location. Discussions included the necessity of adopting prior successful procedures similar to those in past sessions, with an acknowledgment of the unique challenges posed by current legal requirements. Members expressed varying viewpoints on balancing the need for thorough public participation while addressing logistical challenges inherent in the redistricting process. Overall, the meeting demonstrated a collaborative atmosphere aimed at crafting a fair and lawful redistricting plan while acknowledging the diverse opinions of constituents throughout Texas.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

89th Legislative Session Feb 18th, 2025 at 02:02 pm

Texas House Floor Meeting

Transcript Highlights:
  • to recognize the Texas Court Reporters Association.
  • Court reporters are over here on the south side of the gallery; could you please stand?
  • The Texas Court Reporters Association has over 1,000

  • In those respects, members, court reporters undergo years
  • Members, please join me in welcoming the Texas Court

Summary: The meeting of the committee featured several resolutions and bills being discussed, highlighting statewide recognitions and honors. Notable among the resolutions was HR185, commemorating February 18, 2025, as Mission Day, which brings attention to the city of Mission's rich history and contributions to the economy, particularly in citrus production and international trade. Additionally, HR277 recognized the Alabama Cushata Tribe of Texas Day, honoring the tribe's heritage and its longstanding presence in the state.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
  • span marker="79" data-time="468">We know that there is someone who submitted a map that the Supreme Court
  • The point is to hide from the court. To do as much in secret and in the dark as possible.
  • So when the Supreme Court nullifies a provision of the Voting Rights Act that requires this state in
  • after the Supreme Court struck down that provision of the
  • And now we have just seen this state's response to the courts, weakening another provision of the Voting
Summary: The House Select Committee on Congressional Registration convened to discuss and vote on HB4, a congressional redistricting bill. During the meeting, Representative Turner expressed strong opposition, labeling the bill as discriminatory and racially motivated, claiming it intended to dismantle historically minority districts. Overall, there was a significant public outcry regarding the process, with many constituents unable to voice their concerns effectively. Despite the strong backlash, the bill was moved forward without amendments, reflecting broader tensions in the committee regarding representation and civic engagement. Members voiced their concerns about the bill's implications on minority communities and how the redistricting process appeared opaque. Emotional testimonies highlighted the potential disenfranchisement of historically marginalized groups, with representatives stressing the importance of community representation in Congress. Although the bill was passed along party lines, it sparked a commitment among members to continue advocating for fairness and transparency in future legislative processes.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Corrections May 5th, 2025 at 10:05 am

House Corrections Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • They do now to convince a court that the crime which is on
  • This not only delays the process but also places directors in difficult positions with both the courts
  • Courts like this body are elected by their jurisdiction, and the people that vote for judges elect them
  • The Judicial Advisory Council members are appointed by the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court or
  • ...Criminal Court of Appeals.
Bills: SB663, SB958
Summary: During this committee meeting, significant discussions surrounded various bills including HB1969, SB958, and SB663. Representative Allen moved that HB1969 be reported favorably without amendments, which was adopted amidst a few dissenting votes concerning amendments on fees. The most notable conversation revolved around SB958, where Representative Thompson and other advocates passionately presented the case for trafficking survivors and the need to expand the list of sealable misdemeanors for these individuals. Witness testimonies reflected real-world implications, with survivors sharing their experiences to underscore the urgent need for legislative action.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Business and Commerce (Part II) May 1st, 2025

Senate Business & Commerce Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • ...court personnel when he took his own life because we had
  • We have Megan Lavoie from the Texas Office of Court Administration.
  • for the Office of Court Administration.
  • So that provision allows court staff, or clerk staff, or Judicial Conduct Commission staff to use their
  • It's, from what I understand, because this is already provided for judges, and it's just adding court
Summary: The committee meeting focused heavily on the discussion surrounding HB149, an act aimed at establishing a comprehensive framework for the regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) in Texas. The bill seeks to ensure that AI technologies are developed and deployed in a manner that is both innovative and responsible, addressing potential harms while protecting individual rights and privacy. Chairman Schwartner led the conversations, emphasizing the importance of balancing regulatory measures with the need for technological advancement. Several stakeholders, including legal experts and industry representatives, provided testimony in support of the bill, praising its potential to position Texas as a leader in AI governance. Public testimony reflected a mixture of support and caution, with some witnesses advocating for greater accountability and regulatory oversight to mitigate risks associated with AI systems.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

State Affairs (Part I) Apr 10th, 2025

Senate State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • The liberal anti-gun lobby convinced the court to side with them.
  • The Office of the Attorney General may recover attorneys' fees and court costs in suits brought under
  • That breached the secrecy, and in this case, our court, the court has said: nobody gets the data.
  • Even the court recognizes the First Amendment that

  • nobody is to have the data, even the court.
Summary: The Committee on State Affairs convened for a detailed examination of SB1065. The session was marked by comprehensive discussions surrounding the potential implications of this legislation. Members engaged in dialogue regarding the bill's objectives, with presentations from the bill's author and various stakeholders, highlighting differing perspectives on its necessity and impact. Public input was also sought, allowing for a range of opinions to be expressed, which enriched the deliberative process. Notably, Senator Haldeman emphasized the importance of the bill for improving community resources and addressing urgent needs in public services.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Apr 14th, 2025 at 10:04 am

House Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • Now, we have a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals case,

  • Do you expect the Supreme Court to make these weapons legal across the country?
  • That's our Supreme Court standard by which we judge Second Amendment infringements.
  • Right now, you say a license holder couldn't carry inside a court or offices utilized by a court.
  • This bill will allow guns in sensitive places, court rulings like Bruin, Heller...
Summary: The committee meeting featured a rigorous discussion on several bills, most notably House Bill 4201, which aims to expand firearm carry rights for licensed individuals on government-owned properties, including schools. The proponent of the bill, Representative Schatzlein, emphasized the importance of safeguarding the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Texans. However, multiple witnesses testified against the bill, arguing that it could lead to increased risks, particularly in sensitive locations like educational institutions, where the presence of firearms could exacerbate safety concerns. Testimonies from representatives of various organizations, including Texas Gun Sense and Moms Demand Action, highlighted the potential dangers such legislation could introduce, and many witnesses shared personal stories that reinforced their opposition to the bill.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

State Affairs Apr 25th, 2025 at 08:04 am

House State Affairs Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • That process is through the courts and outlined in Texas law.
  • the legality of local marijuana ordinances was challenged, the Attorney General took those cases to court
  • General in the future thinks that a city has violated state law, the Attorney General can take it to court
  • If it poses a real threat, the court can issue an injunction. That's the process.
  • This bill would give the Attorney General the power of the courts and fine cities up to $50,000 per day
Summary: The meeting of the committee brought forward several bills, including notable discussions on HB5082 and HB5510. During the meeting, concerns regarding local governments' ability to adopt decriminalization policies were addressed, particularly as these have led to legal actions involving the state. Witness testimonies presented both support and opposition to the bills, with strong sentiments expressed on both sides. Representative Leach advocated for stricter regulations on abortion drug trafficking and the need for better protections for women. An emotional debate ensued addressing the implications of these regulations on women's health and rights. Additionally, the committee debated the repercussions of the bills on local governance and public health outcomes.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Criminal Justice May 14th, 2025

Senate Criminal Justice Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • As the Supreme Court has recognized, freedom from bodily restraint has always been at the core of liberty
  • /span> When the presumption of innocence applies, it is, as the court
  • The Supreme Court held that because of all these things

  • So whereas the general public could not get those files, if it is in a criminal court, those files would
  • been accused of overreacting in situations three times previously, and that could be brought into the court
Bills: SB3073, SJR87
Summary: The Senate Committee on Criminal Justice convened to discuss important legislative amendments regarding bail reform in Texas. The meeting centered around two key bills: SJR87 and SB3073. SJR87 is a proposed constitutional amendment aimed at imposing stricter bail conditions for repeat violent offenders, requiring judges to deny bail without individual assessments of risk in certain cases. This sparked contentious debate, highlighting the concerns among committee members and public witnesses about potential infringements on due process and judicial discretion. Proponents argued that the amendment would help safeguard the community against repeat offenders by ensuring that those with serious crimes on their record could not be released on bail under questionable circumstances.
TX

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Education K-16 Feb 27th, 2025

Senate Education K-16 Committee

Transcript Highlights:
  • That's a balance that's struck by the Supreme Court.
  • The Supreme Court makes sure that schools are in the business.
  • After a nine-year court battle, the Texas Supreme Court
  • Court of Appeals in January 2024.
  • Supreme Court in the FCC v. Pacifica Foundation case.
Summary: The committee meeting focused on various bills primarily aimed at enhancing parental rights within the educational system. Notable discussions included Senate Bill 204, which mandates the creation of a user-friendly handbook for parents detailing their rights regarding their children's education, and Senate Bill 609, designed to hold school districts accountable to parents and ensure transparency in educational practices. A significant amount of public testimony was offered both for and against these measures, reflecting the contentious nature of the subject matter. Senators emphasized the importance of parental involvement and education reform, fostering a robust dialogue among committee members and constituents alike. The meeting concluded with a commitment to address all bills thoroughly and attentively.

Research Filters

States
Terms / Sessions
Date Range
Chamber Records
Meetings / Events / Calendars