Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'Texas Department of Housing'
Page 64 of 64
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
Business and CommerceAudio only. Apr 23rd, 2025
Senate Business & Commerce Committee
Transcript Highlights:
As a matter of record, there being 10 present, the quorum
Chair lays out as a matter of pending business.
Keywords:
Senate, Committee on Business and Commerce, Senate Bill 324, quorum, vote, legislation, Senator Colquhart, business agenda
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Committee on Business and Commerce was convened to discuss and vote on Senate Bill 324. After calling the roll and establishing a quorum, the committee discussed the bill's implications. Senator Colquhart moved that Senate Bill 324 be reported favorably to the full Senate, leading to a vote where there were 4 ayes and 2 nays. The bill was ultimately reported to the full Senate for further consideration. Chair Lee facilitated the meeting, ensuring all members had the opportunity to voice their opinions on the legislation. Following the bill's passage, the meeting was adjourned with discussions on potential upcoming business from the committee.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- All of that, I believe, is set out in statute, and so.
- span marker="235" data-time="1404"> If we can get a copy of
Bills:
SJR81
Keywords:
tax exemption, ad valorem, tangible personal property, income production, constitutional amendment, HB1173, local governance, economic impact, public testimony, committee discussion
Summary:
The meeting primarily focused on the discussion surrounding HB1173, where various members raised concerns over its implications. The chair opened the floor for testimony from both supporters and opponents of the bill, highlighting the significant interest in its potential impact on local governance and services. During the meeting, some members emphasized the importance of considering economic and social factors before making a decision on the bill. The conversation transitioned into a more detailed analysis of specific provisions within the bill, indicating a robust engagement among committee members. This fitted within a broader context of legislative scrutiny where public input was solicited and valued.