Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'Congressional declaration'
Page 1 of 23
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th Regular
S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs Mar 17th, 2025 at 11:00 am
House S/C on Defense & Veterans' Affairs
Transcript Highlights:
- Constitution, Congress alone holds the power to declare war.
- declaration of war.
- Right, they would get a formal declaration of war.
- race for Congressional District 32.
- He declared that war, which has also been a catastrophe.
Keywords:
highway designation, veteran recognition, commemorative, transportation, Brazoria County, Texas National Guard, combat duty, military activation, state requirements, emergency response, Texas National Guard, active combat duty, military service, Congressional action, Governor responsibilities, Texas National Guard, combat duty, Congressional declaration, military activation, state law
Summary:
During the meeting, the committee deliberated on several bills primarily focused on veteran welfare and transition issues. One of the main highlights was the discussion of HB39, which proposes to improve data collection on veteran suicide rates, addressing the alarming statistics that reveal veterans are dying by suicide at a rate significantly higher than the general population. The bill seeks to mandate the Texas Department of Health and Human Services to submit aggregate data regarding deceased veterans to the Texas Veterans Commission, ensuring proper analysis and reporting on this critical issue. Witnesses, including mental health professionals and veterans, provided their insights, emphasizing the importance of having accurate data to inform better policies for preventing veteran suicides.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Again, I think you referred to we did congressional redistricting in 2003.
- I think it was in 2008. 2003 was just Congressional. In 2023, we did...
- So at what point did you determine that new congressional maps needed to be redrawn?
- In 2023, we did not take up congressional redistricting.
- That's not a factor in determining these congressional districts.
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting focused primarily on the congressional redistricting resolution prompted by the governor's request due to constitutional concerns flagged by the U.S. Department of Justice. Members discussed the procedural steps necessary to establish a special committee on congressional redistricting, emphasizing the need for transparency and public participation. Concerns were raised about the limited number of planned regional hearings and the implications for community input. A strong commitment to include public testimony through both in-person and virtual means was stated, ensuring that Texans can engage with the process regardless of their geographical location.
Discussions included the necessity of adopting prior successful procedures similar to those in past sessions, with an acknowledgment of the unique challenges posed by current legal requirements. Members expressed varying viewpoints on balancing the need for thorough public participation while addressing logistical challenges inherent in the redistricting process. Overall, the meeting demonstrated a collaborative atmosphere aimed at crafting a fair and lawful redistricting plan while acknowledging the diverse opinions of constituents throughout Texas.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Are we sure we did two congressional...?
- just Congressional.
- maps, but in 2023, we did not do the Congressional maps.
- They only can apply to the congressional map.
- to have five regional hearings on any congressional map.
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting centered around the discussion of congressional redistricting, where the committee established the procedures to ensure a fair and transparent process. Led by Senator King, the session focused on adopting a resolution that authorized a special committee dedicated to congressional redistricting and allowed for regional hearings to gather public input via videoconferencing. Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate notice for public participation, especially from marginalized communities potentially affected by proposed changes. Disagreements emerged regarding the timeline for regional hearings and how to address the implications of the redistricting process on minority districts. Overall, participants acknowledged the complex nature of redistricting and the importance of engaging constituents in the legislative process.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 26th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
The Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting
- ...represented in Congressional District 4 by Congressman
- I'm a proud resident of Congressional District [number].
- I'm a resident of Dallas, Texas, in Senate District 23 and Congressional District 30.
- I'm a resident of Texas's 4th Congressional District.
Summary:
The Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting convened to gather public input regarding redistricting in the North Texas region. With an emphasis on improving public participation, several committee members expressed the need for in-person hearings, highlighting the limitations of virtual formats. Despite technical glitches, participants were encouraged to provide testimony via video conference. Notably, one citizen voiced concerns about the legislature's shift away from traditional redistricting processes, arguing that mid-decade changes undermine fair representation. The committee reiterated its commitment to collecting public opinion and plans to hold future hearings in different regions of Texas.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 1st, 2025 at 10:08 am
Transcript Highlights:
- Congressional Districts from 2013 to 2022.
- And while I still live in the 18th Congressional District, large swaths of the 18th Congressional District's
- You've stolen our congressional voice.
- So I'm losing a congressional district.
- of the historic Congressional District 18.
Keywords:
redistricting, HB4, congressional maps, public testimony, demographics, transparency, representation
Summary:
The meeting focused heavily on congressional redistricting, centering around the discussion of HB4, a bill that aims to revise the congressional map based on population shifts and other demographic factors. Notable was Vice Chair Rosenthal's critique of the process and the lack of transparency regarding the bill's plans which he characterized as a 'rigged matter'. Multiple public hearings were conducted prior to this meeting, allowing citizens to register opinions about the congressional lines, and numerous testimonies were presented both for and against the proposed changes in the districts. The testimony revealed significant concern over how the redistricting could impact various communities and representations moving forward.
Discussions included the implications of changing demographics, and members addressed how the modifications aimed to promote fair representation while considering historical voting patterns. As the committee adjourned, there were hints of continued deliberation on the matter with members expressing intention to finalize the bill in a subsequent session. The meeting demonstrated the committee's commitment to addressing public sentiment and legislative responsibility regarding district boundaries.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Session (Part I)Opening Day of the 89th Legislature, First Called Session Jul 21st, 2025
Texas Senate Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- Attorney General to prosecute state election crimes, and legislation that provides a review of the Congressional
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting of the 89th Legislature featured discussions primarily centered around several key bills, including SB648 concerning protections against title theft and deed fraud, SB1253 which addresses impact fees for builders incorporating water conservation measures, and SB2878 related to the administration of the judicial department. The session began with a prayer acknowledging the devastating floods that affected Central Texas, followed by a message from Governor Greg Abbott calling for the special session. Members engaged in robust debates on the importance of the proposed legislations, particularly focusing on community recovery efforts following recent natural disasters. Public testimonies were elicited, highlighting the varied perspectives on the bills under discussion and underscoring the significance of legislative action in response to constituents' needs.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
89th Legislative Session - First Called Session Jul 30th, 2025 at 09:07 am
Texas House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
In front of the Committee on Congressional Redistricting
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, hemp regulation, public safety, environmental conservation, legislative discussions
Summary:
During the meeting, the committee addressed several key pieces of legislation, including discussions about HB4, which pertains to the congressional redistricting process, and HB5, focusing on the regulation of hemp products. Other bills, such as HB11 and HB13, were also introduced, with members expressing varying levels of support and concerns regarding their implications. Public testimony was not featured heavily during this session, but the members engaged in thorough discussions about the potential impacts of the proposed bills, especially in terms of public safety and environmental concerns. The session concluded with the committee preparing to reconvene later in the day to continue their deliberations.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 29th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- They want to go back to the way the congressional...
- I'm in Congressional District.
- As a former congressional candidate...
- I'm a native Texan, a concerned scientist, and a former congressional candidate for Texas's 21st Congressional
- I live in Congressional District 10.
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, gerrymandering, public testimony, transparency, community involvement, minority representation
Summary:
The committee meeting addressed the contentious issue of congressional redistricting, following concerns about the legality and fairness of past maps that allegedly disenfranchised minority voters. The testimony predominantly rejected the notion of conducting mid-decade redistricting, with multiple witnesses arguing against the initiative citing lack of legal justification and the risk of exacerbating racial gerrymandering. Prominent discussions included calls for more transparency in the redistricting process, with several members expressing the need for public engagement through field hearings and meaningful opportunities to review and comment on proposed maps. Senator King and other members led discussions emphasizing the significance of community involvement in shaping equitable congressional districts that reflect Texas' demographics.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Aug 6th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
The special committee on congressional redistricting will come to
- data-time="324"> Of allowing those invited members, which, by the way, includes all the Democrat congressional
Now, additionally, all 12 Democrat U.S. congressional
- They certainly can, because it's open to the public, and the congressional members can as well.
- Congressional members and for the invited experts or invited
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, C2308, testimony, public participation, Voter Rights Act, map
Summary:
The special committee on congressional redistricting convened to discuss Congressional Plan C-2308. Initially, the meeting aimed to bring invited witnesses to testify about the potential impacts of the redistricting plan. Unfortunately, most invited witnesses did not attend, nor did they respond to the committee's invitations, leaving the committee without significant testimony on the plan. However, the committee expressed its intent to allow public testimony on the map in a subsequent hearing, emphasizing the importance of citizen engagement in the redistricting process.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 2nd, 2025 at 09:08 am
Transcript Highlights:
The House Select Committee on Congressional Registration
- >
As a matter of pending business: Members, this is the congressional
- midnight last night, less than 10 hours ago, to ram through a discriminatory and racially motivated congressional
- This map intentionally dismantles multiple majority-minority congressional districts, in which voters
- and the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting
Keywords:
redistricting, HB4, congressional representation, discrimination, minority districts, public testimony, Civic engagement
Summary:
The House Select Committee on Congressional Registration convened to discuss and vote on HB4, a congressional redistricting bill. During the meeting, Representative Turner expressed strong opposition, labeling the bill as discriminatory and racially motivated, claiming it intended to dismantle historically minority districts. Overall, there was a significant public outcry regarding the process, with many constituents unable to voice their concerns effectively. Despite the strong backlash, the bill was moved forward without amendments, reflecting broader tensions in the committee regarding representation and civic engagement.
Members voiced their concerns about the bill's implications on minority communities and how the redistricting process appeared opaque. Emotional testimonies highlighted the potential disenfranchisement of historically marginalized groups, with representatives stressing the importance of community representation in Congress. Although the bill was passed along party lines, it sparked a commitment among members to continue advocating for fairness and transparency in future legislative processes.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Aug 21st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
The Senate special committee on congressional redistricting will come
- I haven't spoken to any members of the congressional leadership.
- Congressional members without ever moving.
- ...or congressional districts of their party.
Congressional District 15, Congressional District 28
Keywords:
redistricting, HB4, SB4, congressional districts, public testimony, Senate committee, political implications
Summary:
The meeting of the special committee on congressional redistricting was convened to discuss and vote on HB4, a key bill aimed at revising congressional district maps in Texas. Chairman King presented the bill, which is a companion to SB4 that had already passed out of the Senate. The discussion focused on minor differences between HB4 and SB4, primarily revolving around the political implications of the proposed changes. Several senators highlighted concerns over the lack of public testimony for the amendments, raising questions about the inclusiveness of the redistricting process. The committee ultimately voted to report HB4 favorably to the Senate, with a narrow vote of 5 to 3. This spirited debate underscored the contentious nature of redistricting and its impact on electoral outcomes.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 25th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Nobody said a word about the congressional maps, the congressional lines.
- Is that targeting of those congressional districts?
- to Congressional District 7 and Congressional District 32
- As a former congressional district staffer, I know firsthand that stretched-out, gerrymandered congressional
- Congressional District 10. I strongly oppose the attempt to redistrict our congressional districts.
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, fair representation, public testimony, Congressional districts, disaster recovery, climate crisis
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting was convened to discuss the redistricting process in light of ongoing concerns over gerrymandering and the potential impact on fair representation, particularly for communities of color in Texas. Chair Phil King welcomed committee members and emphasized the importance of public participation. Throughout the meeting, numerous witnesses provided testimony, raising urgent issues regarding how proposed changes to congressional districts would affect the political landscape, local representation, and disaster response efforts in the wake of recent events. Many speakers highlighted a sense of urgency, as they felt that the focus on redistricting was a diversion from pressing matters such as disaster recovery and climate response.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 26th, 2025 at 11:07 am
Transcript Highlights:
- any of those declarations, so I'm unsure.
- So yes, the 18th Congressional...
- I live in Congressional District 9.
- Congressional District 18 candidate.
- I am in Congressional District 18.
Keywords:
redistricting, representation, public testimony, Congressional Districts, gerrymandering, Voting Rights Act, community engagement
Summary:
The House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting convened to discuss a revised congressional redistricting plan as part of a special session. The meeting focused on public testimony regarding potential revisions to the redistricting map due to concerns about representation for Congressional Districts 2, 7, 8, and 9. Several witnesses testified against the proposed changes, expressing worries about gerrymandering and the disproportionate impact on minority communities. Notably, Deborah Allen, a former city council member, implored the committee members to heed the concerns of constituents who fear losing representation during this critical redistricting process. The atmosphere was charged as multiple lawmakers and public members voiced their frustrations about the perceived political motives driving the redistricting efforts rather than addressing urgent local needs.
The committee faced questions regarding the lack of concrete maps available for public commentary, raising concerns about transparency in the redistricting process. Some members argued that the hearings should prioritize community engagement across the state rather than being limited to a few locations. Various testimonies highlighted fears that the redistricting plan might undermine the gains made in voter representation, particularly among marginalized groups. As the meeting concluded, it became clear that the committee might need to hold further hearings to ensure the public's voice was adequately represented before moving forward with any decisions.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 28th, 2025 at 05:07 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- I oppose the mid-redistricting of congressional districts.
- If you look at today's congressional...
- Two new congressional districts were created.
- And an all-revised congressional redistricting plan?
- I reside in Congressional District 32.
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, public testimony, congressional maps, representation, minority communities, discrimination, voting rights
Summary:
The committee meeting primarily focused on public testimonies regarding the revised congressional redistricting plan. Numerous witnesses presented their concerns about how the proposed changes could potentially dilute representation for minority communities. A consistent theme throughout the testimonies was the fear that the redistricting effort was not aimed at serving constituents but rather at securing power for political parties. Several participants expressed a strong opposition to what they perceived as gerrymandering tactics, claiming they would negatively impact African-American and Hispanic communities in Texas. The meeting revealed a clear public sentiment against the redistricting proposals, with nearly all witnesses speaking out against the changes. The Chair noted an overwhelming number of testimonies opposing the redistricting, indicating a strong community response to the proposed changes and their implications on fair representation.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 28th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- The governor has added the subject of congressional redistricting.
- During congressional redistricting, the congressional delegations
- We work with the 18th Congressional District.
- I'm a lifelong resident of Congressional District 30.
- I mean, Congressional District 18?
Keywords:
redistricting, congressional districts, DOJ letter, voter suppression, gerrymandering, public testimony, community representation
Summary:
The Senate special committee convened to address issues related to congressional redistricting, particularly focusing on the implications of a recent DOJ letter concerning majority-minority districts. Various senators expressed strong concerns about the motivations behind the proposed redistricting efforts, asserting that they may infringe on the rights of black and brown communities across Texas. Numerous members of the public provided passionate testimony, voicing their fears over potential voter suppression and gerrymandering, while others pushed for greater representation of underrepresented communities in the redistricting process. The committee aims to gather this public input as part of its overall redistricting considerations during the special session.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
Committee on Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 18th, 2025 at 05:08 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- Congressional District 9 remains a Republican district.
- District 30 still in that congressional district now?
- or Congressional District.
- When it comes to Congressional District 33, Chairman Hunter.
- What were the changes in economic engines to Congressional...?
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, HB4, committee substitute, political representation, public testimony, transparency in governance
Summary:
During the meeting of the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting, significant discussions revolved around the proposed changes to HB4. The committee focused on a committee substitute that aimed to redraw congressional district lines to enhance Republican representation. Concerns were raised about the transparency and fairness of the redistricting process, particularly regarding input from historically underrepresented communities. Representative Woo notably objected to the lack of public testimony on the new maps, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in governance. Despite objections, the committee debated the necessity of the changes and eventually voted to adopt the substitute to recommend its passage to the full House.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 24th, 2025 at 02:07 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- districts, Congressional Districts 37 and 38.
- It says, as stated below, Congressional Districts TX-9.
- to the congressional redistricting plan.
- So, okay, so congressional...
- Congressional redistricting mid-decade is not required.
Keywords:
redistricting, C-2193, public testimony, flood relief, congressional districts, racial implications, representation, Texas legislature
Summary:
The meeting of the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting primarily focused on public testimony regarding the proposed revisions to the congressional redistricting plan known as C-2193. Various members of the public expressed their concerns about potential racial implications of the redistricting process, particularly the impact on black and brown communities. Testimonies highlighted the urgency for the legislature to prioritize flood relief and infrastructure instead of redistricting mid-decade, arguing that it undermines representative fairness and could disenfranchise many voters. The session saw active engagement from constituents who emphasized the importance of public input and transparency in a potentially transformative legislative process. The chair outlined a two-phase hearing plan to gather comprehensive public feedback before moving forward with legislative drafts.
US
Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session
Joint hearings with the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs to examine the legislative presentation of The American Legion and multi VSOs: Minority Veterans of America, Jewish War Veterans of the U.S.A, National Association of County Veterans Servic Feb 26th, 2025 at 09:00 am
Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee
Keywords:
veteran services, homelessness, unemployment, VA funding, mental health, congressional oversight, testimonies, American Legion, Dole Act, suicide prevention
Summary:
This meeting focused on veteran services, emphasizing the urgent need to address the alarming rate of unemployment and homelessness among veterans. Numerous testimonies were presented detailing the impact of mass furloughs and cutbacks at the VA on personnel, notably veterans who were serving as employees. Various representatives expressed deep concern over how these firings could drastically affect the quality of care available to those who have served the nation. There was a strong call for Congress to bolster funding for existing programs aimed at alleviating veteran homelessness and improving overall care quality, especially in mental health services.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
89th Legislative Session - First Called Session Aug 8th, 2025 at 01:08 pm
Texas House Floor Meeting
Bills:
HB4
Keywords:
redistricting, congressional districts, Texas Legislature, elections, 2020 Census, quorum, attendance, administrative policies, civil arrest, flood recovery, infrastructure funding, legislation
Summary:
In this meeting, key discussions revolved around the enactment of new measures to manage member attendance and address quorum issues. The chairman addressed the ongoing challenges presented by absent members and introduced administrative policies impacting pay and expenses for those not present. He emphasized the need for all members to return expeditiously, or face consequences, including potential civil arrest for those evading attendance. The significance of HB3, a priority legislation concerning flood recovery and infrastructure funding, was highlighted as essential for restoring communities affected by recent flooding, following extensive testimonies from impacted citizens.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
89th Legislative Session - First Called Session Aug 4th, 2025 at 03:08 pm
Texas House Floor Meeting
Bills:
HB4
Keywords:
redistricting, congressional districts, Texas Legislature, elections, 2020 Census, quorum, disaster recovery, human trafficking, legislation, Speaker's warning, Texas families, absent members
Summary:
The meeting focused on significant legislative issues and the need for prompt actions regarding disaster recovery, human trafficking, and local governance. Speaker raised concerns about the absence of several members, which hindered the establishment of a quorum and delayed critical discussions. Emphasis was placed on the responsibilities of elected officials to their constituents, with a stern warning that their absence would lead to necessary actions being taken to ensure their return to fulfill their duties. The Speaker highlighted the urgency of addressing pressing issues faced by Texas families and cited the growing cost of inaction.