Video & Transcript DataContr Research : 'map'
Page 1 of 14
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Aug 6th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- But since so many of them had commented, we really want to give testimony on the precise map that the
- However, that map has now been filed.
- in front of me to point out specific concerns about the map.
- they would testify on that map.
- Tomorrow is reserved for the general public to give testimony on the map.
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, C2308, testimony, public participation, Voter Rights Act, map
Summary:
The special committee on congressional redistricting convened to discuss Congressional Plan C-2308. Initially, the meeting aimed to bring invited witnesses to testify about the potential impacts of the redistricting plan. Unfortunately, most invited witnesses did not attend, nor did they respond to the committee's invitations, leaving the committee without significant testimony on the plan. However, the committee expressed its intent to allow public testimony on the map in a subsequent hearing, emphasizing the importance of citizen engagement in the redistricting process.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- those maps?
- talked to the map makers.
- Current 2021 maps.
- Discuss with the map drawer the map drawer's goals with regard to the constraints.
- I can look at the map, and the map speaks for itself.
Keywords:
disaster relief, emergency preparedness, flood management, local government grants, meteorological forecasting, state appropriations, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, abortion, civil liability, abortion-inducing drugs, qui tam actions, Texas Citizens Participation Act, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, healthcare regulations, judicial branch, court security
Summary:
The meeting was centered around the discussions of several legislative bills, focusing on significant amendments proposed for House Bill 4, which pertains to the election of members of the United States House of Representatives from Texas. Senator Zaffirini presented an amendment to create a bipartisan Texas Redistricting Commission to address concerns over gerrymandering and to improve the fairness of the redistricting process. The amendment sparked a lively debate among the senators, highlighting different perspectives on the implications of such a commission. Some members voiced their support while others raised concerns regarding the potential need for constitutional amendments to adopt such changes. The discussions also included testimony from Senator Gutierrez, who addressed the importance of transparency and public trust in the redistricting process, emphasizing that voters should have confidence in the electoral maps drawn by the state officials.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- You worked on the House map.
- So you mentioned that you didn't draw this map, or these maps. Is that correct? That's correct.
- I haven't drawn a single map.
- In terms of relevance, we're not on the 2021 map, we're on the 2031 map.
- Do you know who drew the map?
Keywords:
disaster relief, emergency preparedness, flood management, local government grants, meteorological forecasting, state appropriations, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, abortion, civil liability, abortion-inducing drugs, qui tam actions, Texas Citizens Participation Act, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, healthcare regulations, judicial branch, court security
Summary:
The committee meeting primarily focused on the discussion of HB4, which pertains to redistricting. Chairman King emphasized the legal compliance of the proposed map and elaborated on its political advantages, stating that the map improves compactness while benefiting Republican candidates. The meeting saw extensive public testimony, with numerous participants voicing concerns about the map's legality and its implications on minority representation. Representative Smith highlighted that the overwhelming majority of public submissions expressed opposition to the redistricting bill, arguing that it disregards the constituents' voices. Debate ensued regarding the necessity and legality of the changes made, particularly concerning minority districts.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Aug 7th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- racist map and these racist maps.
- We want maps. We want real maps. We want access to the ballots.
- I think that the map is more compact than the existing map.
- than the existing map.
- map.
Keywords:
redistricting, HB4, SB4, public testimony, Census 2020, flood relief, representation, special session
Summary:
The meeting of the Committee on Congressional Redistricting focused primarily on the discussion of HB4 and SB4, concerning the redistricting process based on the 2020 Census data. Chairman King opened the session, expressing gratitude to the committee members for their attendance and emphasizing the importance of completing redistricting within the special session's 30-day timeframe. Public testimony was a major component, with numerous individuals voicing their opinions both in favor and against the proposed redistricting maps, emphasizing issues of representation and concerns of racial injustices inherent in the process. The majority of witnesses highlighted the need for immediate attention to pressing issues such as flood relief instead of focusing solely on redistricting.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
89th Legislative Session - Second Called Session Aug 20th, 2025 at 10:08 am
Texas House Floor Meeting
Transcript Highlights:
- So that was a change, even under the previous map, not the 2021 map, but under the previous map...
- And this map, House Bill 4, the map before us today...
- Are you working with anybody on a map? Is there a map?"
- map does.
- look at the map.
Bills:
HB4
Keywords:
redistricting, elections, representation, district composition, Texas House, ad valorem tax, elderly, disabled veterans, public testimony, Texas legislature
Summary:
The committee meeting included extensive discussions on various bills, primarily focusing on ad valorem tax regulations and implications for vulnerable populations such as the elderly and disabled. Representative Schofield presented HB4, which revolves around setting limitations on ad valorem taxes for homesteads of disabled, elderly, and their surviving spouses. The bill sparked a thorough debate among committee members, leading to significant public testimony. Additionally, HJR No. 25 proposed by Cook focused on exempting part of the assessed value of property owned by certain disabled veterans from taxation, highlighting a priority for veteran support within the session's agenda. Overall, the meeting was marked by a strong turnout from both committee members and the public, showcasing a high level of engagement on these critical issues.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- The difference is that this map, this map is going to affect people's lives.
- Under this map, under the map that's being proposed for us to vote on right now.
- This map seeks to bury it.
- The map is laid out.
- That's what this map does.
Keywords:
disaster relief, emergency preparedness, flood management, local government grants, meteorological forecasting, state appropriations, school assessment, public education, accountability, transparency, education standards, abortion, civil liability, abortion-inducing drugs, qui tam actions, Texas Citizens Participation Act, Religious Freedom Restoration Act, healthcare regulations, judicial branch, court security
Summary:
In the recent committee meeting, the primary focus was on HB4, the congressional redistricting bill. Intense debates ensued regarding the implications of this proposed map on minority voting representation. Senator Zaffirini and other members expressed strong opposition, citing that the redistricting efforts were not only untimely but also undermined the gains made by minority communities in past elections. Significant testimony was provided from the public, showing overwhelming disapproval of the proposed changes, with 98% of the testimonies against the bill. Members highlighted the historical context of disenfranchisement and warned that this redistricting would further dilute the voices of crucial voting blocs in Texas.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Aug 17th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Do not pass this map.
- Again, our map...
- those maps, correct?
- I went ahead and, having looked at the map, thought it was a good map.
- did the 2021 map?
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate Bill 4, public testimony, Texas legislature, partisan gain, minority representation, Senator King
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting focused primarily on Senate Bill 4, which has sparked considerable public debate due to its implications on redistricting following the recent census. Senator King laid out the intent and details of SB4, which aims to make significant adjustments that critics argue will disenfranchise minority populations in Texas. Throughout the meeting, concerned citizens shared their testimonies, voicing opposition to the bill primarily on grounds that it manipulates district lines for partisan gain rather than community representation. The emotional testimonies of witnesses highlighted the serious concerns of many about representation in the Texas legislature going forward.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 29th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- It was to replace a court-drawn map with a legislative map.
- Fair maps mean fair elections.
- and the Senate maps.
- have a map yet.
- It was Republicans who drew the map, so it wasn't like it was Democrats who drew the map.
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, gerrymandering, public testimony, transparency, community involvement, minority representation
Summary:
The committee meeting addressed the contentious issue of congressional redistricting, following concerns about the legality and fairness of past maps that allegedly disenfranchised minority voters. The testimony predominantly rejected the notion of conducting mid-decade redistricting, with multiple witnesses arguing against the initiative citing lack of legal justification and the risk of exacerbating racial gerrymandering. Prominent discussions included calls for more transparency in the redistricting process, with several members expressing the need for public engagement through field hearings and meaningful opportunities to review and comment on proposed maps. Senator King and other members led discussions emphasizing the significance of community involvement in shaping equitable congressional districts that reflect Texas' demographics.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 1st, 2025 at 10:08 am
Transcript Highlights:
- And now, because the map...
- ...citizen VAP special tabulation, map, map, map, map comparison
- Look at the map.
- I was directing it all towards the map, and I don't view the map as racist.
- This map is racially discriminatory, even worse than the 2021 map.
Keywords:
redistricting, HB4, congressional maps, public testimony, demographics, transparency, representation
Summary:
The meeting focused heavily on congressional redistricting, centering around the discussion of HB4, a bill that aims to revise the congressional map based on population shifts and other demographic factors. Notable was Vice Chair Rosenthal's critique of the process and the lack of transparency regarding the bill's plans which he characterized as a 'rigged matter'. Multiple public hearings were conducted prior to this meeting, allowing citizens to register opinions about the congressional lines, and numerous testimonies were presented both for and against the proposed changes in the districts. The testimony revealed significant concern over how the redistricting could impact various communities and representations moving forward.
Discussions included the implications of changing demographics, and members addressed how the modifications aimed to promote fair representation while considering historical voting patterns. As the committee adjourned, there were hints of continued deliberation on the matter with members expressing intention to finalize the bill in a subsequent session. The meeting demonstrated the committee's commitment to addressing public sentiment and legislative responsibility regarding district boundaries.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 26th, 2025 at 11:07 am
Transcript Highlights:
- And that's not what these maps have done. Do we need new maps? We do. Do we need better maps? Yes.
- once they have the map.
- These maps being drawn...
- We don't have a map. After people and experts get the map, please...
- Maps must be made...
Keywords:
redistricting, representation, public testimony, Congressional Districts, gerrymandering, Voting Rights Act, community engagement
Summary:
The House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting convened to discuss a revised congressional redistricting plan as part of a special session. The meeting focused on public testimony regarding potential revisions to the redistricting map due to concerns about representation for Congressional Districts 2, 7, 8, and 9. Several witnesses testified against the proposed changes, expressing worries about gerrymandering and the disproportionate impact on minority communities. Notably, Deborah Allen, a former city council member, implored the committee members to heed the concerns of constituents who fear losing representation during this critical redistricting process. The atmosphere was charged as multiple lawmakers and public members voiced their frustrations about the perceived political motives driving the redistricting efforts rather than addressing urgent local needs.
The committee faced questions regarding the lack of concrete maps available for public commentary, raising concerns about transparency in the redistricting process. Some members argued that the hearings should prioritize community engagement across the state rather than being limited to a few locations. Various testimonies highlighted fears that the redistricting plan might undermine the gains made in voter representation, particularly among marginalized groups. As the meeting concluded, it became clear that the committee might need to hold further hearings to ensure the public's voice was adequately represented before moving forward with any decisions.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Oh, you voted for the 2023 maps, right? The congressional maps?
- on any map.
- Who is drawing the map? I'm not drawing a map. I don't know of anyone.
- A map, if I did not think it was a legal map. You thought it was a legal map, not an...
- Illegal map, a legal map.
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting centered around the discussion of congressional redistricting, where the committee established the procedures to ensure a fair and transparent process. Led by Senator King, the session focused on adopting a resolution that authorized a special committee dedicated to congressional redistricting and allowed for regional hearings to gather public input via videoconferencing. Concerns were raised about ensuring adequate notice for public participation, especially from marginalized communities potentially affected by proposed changes. Disagreements emerged regarding the timeline for regional hearings and how to address the implications of the redistricting process on minority districts. Overall, participants acknowledged the complex nature of redistricting and the importance of engaging constituents in the legislative process.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 28th, 2025 at 05:07 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- The only map referenced for the purpose of this hearing is the current map.
- Like everybody else, I have not seen a map. So if, indeed, a map was...
- Those maps...
- These maps risk.
- These maps give the.
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, public testimony, congressional maps, representation, minority communities, discrimination, voting rights
Summary:
The committee meeting primarily focused on public testimonies regarding the revised congressional redistricting plan. Numerous witnesses presented their concerns about how the proposed changes could potentially dilute representation for minority communities. A consistent theme throughout the testimonies was the fear that the redistricting effort was not aimed at serving constituents but rather at securing power for political parties. Several participants expressed a strong opposition to what they perceived as gerrymandering tactics, claiming they would negatively impact African-American and Hispanic communities in Texas. The meeting revealed a clear public sentiment against the redistricting proposals, with nearly all witnesses speaking out against the changes. The Chair noted an overwhelming number of testimonies opposing the redistricting, indicating a strong community response to the proposed changes and their implications on fair representation.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Aug 21st, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- and Senate map, in trying to...
- So let's check off: you established the House map and that's what you filed.
- drawn the map for more Republicans.
- Chairman, I find it awfully funny that you didn't draw a map; you just took that House map.
- I took the House map because it met the objectives that...
Keywords:
redistricting, HB4, SB4, congressional districts, public testimony, Senate committee, political implications
Summary:
The meeting of the special committee on congressional redistricting was convened to discuss and vote on HB4, a key bill aimed at revising congressional district maps in Texas. Chairman King presented the bill, which is a companion to SB4 that had already passed out of the Senate. The discussion focused on minor differences between HB4 and SB4, primarily revolving around the political implications of the proposed changes. Several senators highlighted concerns over the lack of public testimony for the amendments, raising questions about the inclusiveness of the redistricting process. The committee ultimately voted to report HB4 favorably to the Senate, with a narrow vote of 5 to 3. This spirited debate underscored the contentious nature of redistricting and its impact on electoral outcomes.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 25th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Katz, you stated that doing a map...
- Once they had come up with a map, that map had to be approved.
- That being said, there is a map in the...
- The current maps are already unfair.
- Texas just redrew its maps in 2021, and we're still waiting for the outcome on those maps that were challenged
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, fair representation, public testimony, Congressional districts, disaster recovery, climate crisis
Summary:
The meeting of the Senate Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting was convened to discuss the redistricting process in light of ongoing concerns over gerrymandering and the potential impact on fair representation, particularly for communities of color in Texas. Chair Phil King welcomed committee members and emphasized the importance of public participation. Throughout the meeting, numerous witnesses provided testimony, raising urgent issues regarding how proposed changes to congressional districts would affect the political landscape, local representation, and disaster response efforts in the wake of recent events. Many speakers highlighted a sense of urgency, as they felt that the focus on redistricting was a diversion from pressing matters such as disaster recovery and climate response.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Senate Special Committee on Congressional Redistricting Jul 28th, 2025
Transcript Highlights:
- Now, most of this is about maps.
- Our maps must catch up.
- of a trial over Texas' current maps, when concerns over those maps are still pending.
- We shouldn't create new maps; we should ensure that the 2021 maps comply with the Voting Rights Act.
- I would love to comment on a map, but I've seen no clear map for this hearing today.
Keywords:
redistricting, congressional districts, DOJ letter, voter suppression, gerrymandering, public testimony, community representation
Summary:
The Senate special committee convened to address issues related to congressional redistricting, particularly focusing on the implications of a recent DOJ letter concerning majority-minority districts. Various senators expressed strong concerns about the motivations behind the proposed redistricting efforts, asserting that they may infringe on the rights of black and brown communities across Texas. Numerous members of the public provided passionate testimony, voicing their fears over potential voter suppression and gerrymandering, while others pushed for greater representation of underrepresented communities in the redistricting process. The committee aims to gather this public input as part of its overall redistricting considerations during the special session.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Congressional Redistricting, Select Jul 24th, 2025 at 02:07 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- I mean, where is the map?
- The maps—I don't know; you keep saying there are maps, but there are not maps.
- We deserve fair maps.
- shouldn't be any maps.
- interested in the map.
Keywords:
redistricting, C-2193, public testimony, flood relief, congressional districts, racial implications, representation, Texas legislature
Summary:
The meeting of the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting primarily focused on public testimony regarding the proposed revisions to the congressional redistricting plan known as C-2193. Various members of the public expressed their concerns about potential racial implications of the redistricting process, particularly the impact on black and brown communities. Testimonies highlighted the urgency for the legislature to prioritize flood relief and infrastructure instead of redistricting mid-decade, arguing that it undermines representative fairness and could disenfranchise many voters. The session saw active engagement from constituents who emphasized the importance of public input and transparency in a potentially transformative legislative process. The chair outlined a two-phase hearing plan to gather comprehensive public feedback before moving forward with legislative drafts.
TX
Transcript Highlights:
- Look at any map, to make comments on any map.
- Is he drawing the maps?
- , what's wrong with the maps?
- Those were the maps that were voted on. They were legitimate and legal maps.
- You thought it was a legal map, not an illegal map, a legal map.
Keywords:
redistricting, Senate procedures, public input, Texas Legislature, amendments, redistricting, Texas Senate, congressional districts, public input, legislative procedures, redistricting, Senate procedures, congressional districts, public input, legislative transparency, redistricting, Senate rules, congressional districts, public hearings, committee procedures
Summary:
The meeting focused primarily on the congressional redistricting resolution prompted by the governor's request due to constitutional concerns flagged by the U.S. Department of Justice. Members discussed the procedural steps necessary to establish a special committee on congressional redistricting, emphasizing the need for transparency and public participation. Concerns were raised about the limited number of planned regional hearings and the implications for community input. A strong commitment to include public testimony through both in-person and virtual means was stated, ensuring that Texans can engage with the process regardless of their geographical location.
Discussions included the necessity of adopting prior successful procedures similar to those in past sessions, with an acknowledgment of the unique challenges posed by current legal requirements. Members expressed varying viewpoints on balancing the need for thorough public participation while addressing logistical challenges inherent in the redistricting process. Overall, the meeting demonstrated a collaborative atmosphere aimed at crafting a fair and lawful redistricting plan while acknowledging the diverse opinions of constituents throughout Texas.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Press Conference: Special Session Jul 31st, 2025 at 10:07 am
Transcript Highlights:
- The new map cuts that number down to just eight. The map that Republicans put out yesterday...
- in many cases, they will find the doors are shut by this map.
- as it will under this map.
- A prominent senator said that the map was colorblind and it still is.
- This congressional map will double and triple.
Keywords:
redistricting, gerrymandering, Texas Democrats, voter suppression, Hakeem Jeffries, equitable representation, minority communities, legislative session, political motivations
Summary:
The meeting highlighted significant concerns regarding the proposed redistricting in Texas, primarily driven by perceived political motivations from the Republican leadership. Speaker after speaker emphasized the urgency of stopping what they described as an attempt to gerrymander districts and suppress the votes of marginalized communities. Key figures such as House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries underscored that the current plans threaten not just democratic principles but directly impact the well-being of Texas constituents, particularly minority populations. The meeting stirred passionate debate about ensuring equitable representation and addressing systemic injustices within the electoral process. The persistence of local leaders and their collective stand against these actions was a focal point throughout discussions, showcasing a unified front against manipulation of electoral boundaries.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 2nd C.S.
Committee on Congressional Redistricting, Select Aug 18th, 2025 at 05:08 pm
Transcript Highlights:
- I'm trying to look at the map, and there also are not...
- Do we vote the Senate map out, or is it going to be the House substitute?
- Now, I can't predict, but I sure do love the House map and the...
- Chair, once again we object to these maps.
- The way that this process has been done, these maps have been altered.
Keywords:
congressional redistricting, HB4, committee substitute, political representation, public testimony, transparency in governance
Summary:
During the meeting of the House Select Committee on Congressional Redistricting, significant discussions revolved around the proposed changes to HB4. The committee focused on a committee substitute that aimed to redraw congressional district lines to enhance Republican representation. Concerns were raised about the transparency and fairness of the redistricting process, particularly regarding input from historically underrepresented communities. Representative Woo notably objected to the lack of public testimony on the new maps, emphasizing the importance of transparency and accountability in governance. Despite objections, the committee debated the necessity of the changes and eventually voted to adopt the substitute to recommend its passage to the full House.
TX
Texas 2025 - 89th 1st C.S.
Natural Resources Aug 11th, 2025 at 01:08 pm
House Natural Resources Committee
Transcript Highlights:
- ...mapping, that's improved and updated flood mapping and
- That fund is used for mapping, modeling, and planning.
- Slide 22 covers flood mapping and modeling.
- they're not going to replace the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs).
- But that's generally well mapped for all major and minor aquifers.
Keywords:
flood mitigation, water management, Delta Project, infrastructure, community impact, legislative response, flood infrastructure fund, climate adaptation
Summary:
The meeting of the committee emphasized the urgent need for effective flood mitigation strategies in response to recent severe flooding events in South Texas. Local officials, including Commissioner David Fuentes and General Manager Raul Sassin, presented the devastating impacts of heavy rainfall that inundated homes, destroyed infrastructure, and led to significant loss of life. They discussed the importance of projects like the Delta Region Water Management initiative, which aims to manage stormwater effectively while also addressing future water supply challenges. The legislators reiterated the legislature's ongoing commitment to funding and implementing robust flood management policies, underscoring the significance of community involvement in these efforts. The discussions also highlighted innovative approaches to capturing floodwaters for potable use as part of a broader water management strategy.