Rhode Island Senate Bill S2789

Rhode Island 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/24/22
• Refer: 3/24/22
• Report Pass: 6/9/22
• Engrossed: 6/14/22
• Enrolled: 6/22/22
• Passed: 6/27/22

Caption

Proceedings In Aid Of Execution

Impact

The introduction of S2789 aims to streamline the judicial process regarding judgment executions by reducing immediate court involvement. By allowing creditors and debtors the opportunity to negotiate payment agreements outside of the courtroom, the bill seeks to reduce the backlog of cases and foster a culture of negotiation and resolution. This approach could be beneficial for debtors who may need time to assess their financial situation and seek viable repayment options. However, the bill's impact will ultimately depend on its implementation and how effectively it encourages compliance from debtors within the specified timeline.

Summary

Bill S2789, introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly, relates to courts and civil procedure specifically concerning proceedings in aid of execution. The primary focus of the bill is to amend existing regulations in Chapter 9-28, which deals with the execution of judgments that have been returned, either wholly or in part, unsatisfied. The bill mandates that upon an application by a judgment creditor, a citation is issued requiring the judgment debtor to contact the creditor within twenty-five days in an effort to establish a payment agreement before any court intervention occurs. This is designed to encourage communication between creditors and debtors to resolve financial obligations amicably before escalating to legal proceedings.

Contention

While proponents of S2789 argue that it offers a fair chance for debtors to address their obligations without facing immediate court sanctions, there are concerns regarding the enforceability of such agreements. Critics may raise issues related to the potential for abuse, where debtors might ignore the initial 25-day notice, leading to unnecessary escalation in legal pursuits. Therefore, the key contention revolves around balancing debtor protections with the rights of creditors to receive timely payment for judgments. Ensuring that the process is both fair and practical for all parties involved will likely be critical as the bill progresses through the legislative process.