Rhode Island House Bill H5935

Rhode Island 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/1/23

Caption

House Resolution Creating A Special Affirmative Action Legislative Task Force To Develop A Plan To Increase Diversity On Projects Covered By The State Prevailing Wage Rate Law (creates A Eleven (11) Member Affirmative Action Legislative Special Task Force To Study And Provide Recommendations To Increase Diversity On Projects Covered By The State Prevailing Wage Rate Law, And Who Would Report Back To The House Of Representatives)

Impact

If enacted, this bill would create significant changes within Rhode Island's legislative framework pertaining to workforce diversity, particularly in fields affected by the prevailing wage law. The task force would gather data, conduct interviews to identify barriers faced by minorities and women in apprenticeship programs, and suggest initiatives to foster greater inclusivity. Additionally, it will assess current practices and recommend the implementation of measures such as 'Best Value Contracting' that could favor firms demonstrating commitment to diversity.

Summary

House Bill H5935 proposes the establishment of a special legislative task force with the aim to enhance diversity on projects governed by the state's prevailing wage law. The bill emphasizes the need for strategic collaboration with the Rhode Island Department of Education to improve access and quality of career and technical education, particularly focusing on construction and manufacturing programs across all school districts. The task force is to be composed of various stakeholders, including representatives from community organizations and industry professionals, tasked with creating actionable recommendations to forge a more inclusive workforce.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding H5935 may arise from varying opinions on the need for such government interventions. Supporters argue that the task force can help identify and dismantle systemic barriers to entry in high-demand fields, which remain disproportionately represented by non-diverse groups. Conversely, critics could voice concerns regarding the effectiveness of government-led initiatives versus market-driven approaches. The balance between providing educational support and ensuring fair competition among contractors is expected to be a focal point of debate.