Rhode Island House Bill H5701

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Report Pass: 6/16/25
• Engrossed: 6/18/25
• Engrossed: 6/20/25
• Passed: 7/3/25

Caption

Makes the provisions of §§ 45-19.1-3 and 45-19.1-4, benefits for firefighters with cancer, effective regardless of any general, special or specific law, or any charter and/or municipal ordinance to the contrary.

Impact

If enacted, H5701 reinforces the rights of firefighters with regard to occupational diseases and specifically cancer-related claims for disability. The legislation aims to ensure a uniform application of benefits statewide, rendering outdated and potentially conflicting provisions in local laws ineffective. Furthermore, the bill retroactively applies to all cancer-related cases, which could address pending claims for individuals diagnosed with cancer after their employment began, thus providing them with vital support and recognition for their service.

Summary

House Bill 5701 aims to enhance the benefits for firefighters who develop occupational cancer by ensuring these benefits are upheld despite any conflicting municipal laws or ordinances. Specifically, the proposed legislation amends sections of the Rhode Island General Laws related to cancer benefits for firefighters, making it clear that all firefighters, regardless of their employment status—whether state-employed or municipal—are entitled to these benefits if they are diagnosed with cancer linked to their occupation. This initiative not only addresses the immediate needs of firefighters but also clarifies any ambiguities regarding their entitlements under existing laws.

Sentiment

The sentiment around H5701 appears generally supportive among fire service professionals and advocates who recognize the critical need for health protections in a field known for its exposure to hazardous conditions. The firefighters union and health organizations likely view the passage of this bill as a significant step towards safeguarding those who have dedicated their lives to public safety. However, there may be some contention from municipal bodies regarding the mandate, as they could be concerned about budgetary impacts or loss of local regulatory autonomy.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the bill's assertion that benefits for firefighters with cancer will remain effective regardless of pre-existing laws at the municipal level. While proponents see this as necessary for ensuring health equity among firefighters across different jurisdictions, opponents might argue that it undermines local decision-making. Additionally, questions may arise about funding sources for these benefits under municipal budgets, leading to discussions about financial sustainability for cities and towns.