Rhode Island House Bill H5869

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/25
• Refer: 2/28/25
• Report Pass: 6/12/25
• Engrossed: 6/18/25
• Engrossed: 6/20/25
• Passed: 6/26/25

Caption

Eliminates one of two (2) conflicting versions of the science and technology advisory council authorizing statute, clarifying the structure of the council.

Impact

By repealing the existing statute that conflicts with another version, HB 5869 clarifies the council's structure and reinforces its advisory role in the governance of state research and technological initiatives. This legislative action is expected to enhance the council's ability to operate effectively, thereby potentially leading to more robust support for innovation and entrepreneurial endeavors within Rhode Island's research sectors.

Summary

House Bill 5869 seeks to eliminate one of two conflicting versions of the statute that authorizes the creation of the Science and Technology Advisory Council in Rhode Island. The intent of the bill is to provide clarity regarding the structure of this council, which is charged with supporting the state’s research institutions and promoting entrepreneurial development. It aims to streamline the governance of scientific and technological innovation within the state, ensuring that the council's functions are coherent and unambiguous.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 5869 appears to be positive, as it addresses the confusion posed by the existing conflicting statutes. Lawmakers expressing support for the bill emphasize the importance of clear governance structures in fostering a conducive environment for technological advancement and economic development. Stakeholders in the research community are likely to view this as a favorable move toward strengthening the state’s commitment to science and technology.

Contention

While HB 5869 is designed to simplify the governance of technology and science in Rhode Island, there may be concerns regarding its implications for the previously conflicting framework. However, as the focus is on clarification rather than the establishment of new powers or authorities, the contention from opposition is minimal. Overall, the bill is positioned as a constructive adjustment to existing law, aimed at enhancing operational efficacy without major alterations to the underlying objectives of the advisory council.