Rhode Island House Bill H6208

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/9/25
• Refer: 4/9/25
• Report Pass: 5/29/25
• Engrossed: 6/12/25
• Enrolled: 6/18/25
• Passed: 6/24/25

Caption

Strikes the words "which is naturally occurring" with regard to any promulgated rules and regulations of the department of environmental management (DEM) relating to the remediation of arsenic.

Impact

The impact of H6208 is significant as it seeks to clarify the standards under which arsenic, a potentially harmful contaminant, would be regulated in Rhode Island. By striking the phrase 'which is naturally occurring' from existing regulations, the bill aims to reduce the burden on wastewater management systems and industries that may inadvertently handle such materials. This could potentially lead to reduced compliance costs and increased operational efficiency for affected businesses. However, it raises questions about the environmental implications of allowing higher levels of naturally occurring arsenic without remediation.

Summary

House Bill H6208 pertains to the remediation of hazardous waste in Rhode Island, specifically concerning the treatment of naturally occurring arsenic. Introduced by Representative Terri Cortvriend, the bill seeks to amend Section 23-19.1-6 of the General Laws regarding the powers and duties of the director of the Department of Environmental Management (DEM). The proposed amendment removes the stipulation that arsenic considered to be naturally occurring should be subject to remediation regulations if its levels are less than nineteen parts per million (19 ppm). This change reflects an effort to streamline hazardous waste management concerning naturally occurring materials.

Contention

Notably, while proponents may argue that this bill facilitates better management practices by eliminating unnecessary regulations for naturally occurring arsenic, opponents may contend that it risks public health and environmental safety. The contention lies in the balance between regulatory compliance costs for businesses and the potential risk to the community's health from exposure to higher levels of arsenic without mitigation efforts. Discussions surrounding the bill emphasize the need for careful consideration of environmental protections alongside economic impacts.