Rhode Island Senate Bill S0144

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/25
• Refer: 1/31/25

Caption

Permits possession or use of device that muffles sound on any firearm longer than 17” in length and permits the use of such a device by any person while hunting provided that they have a valid hunting license.

Impact

If enacted, S0144 would significantly modify existing statutes related to criminal offenses concerning weapons. It specifically allows individuals who possess a valid hunting license to utilize sound-deadening devices while hunting, thereby enhancing hunting capabilities. Furthermore, the bill prohibits local municipalities and agencies from imposing additional restrictions on the use of suppressors, effectively centralizing the regulations at the state level and ensuring uniformity across Rhode Island. This could impact local hunting traditions and may lead to changes in how hunting regulations are enforced statewide.

Summary

Senate Bill S0144 proposes amendments to existing laws regarding the possession and use of suppressors, or silencers, on firearms within Rhode Island. The bill allows for the legal possession and use of mufflers or silencers on any firearm that exceeds 17 inches in length. Additionally, it permits licensed hunters to use such devices while hunting. The bill aims to standardize the regulations concerning firearms and provide clearer guidelines for the use of suppressors in hunting settings, in recognition of their potential benefits for both the environment and hunting practices.

Contention

Debate surrounding S0144 may center on concerns about noise pollution, gun safety, and the implications of allowing suppressors in hunting scenarios. Proponents argue that the ability to use suppressors can contribute to a more humane hunting process and decrease disturbances to wildlife and nearby communities. Critics, however, might raise alarms regarding the potential misuse of these devices and the broader societal implications of expanded access to silencers. The tension between maintaining traditional hunting practices and adapting to modern firearm technologies could become a focal point in discussions as the bill moves through the legislative process.