Rhode Island Senate Bill S0475

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Report Pass: 5/6/25
• Engrossed: 5/13/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 5/20/25
• Engrossed: 5/29/25
• Passed: 6/6/25

Caption

Requires public or private golf courses to have an automated external defibrillator on the premises.

Impact

The implementation of S0475 will amend the health and safety laws in the state to include specific requirements for golf courses to maintain AEDs. This amendment reflects a growing recognition of the importance of immediate medical intervention in cases of cardiac arrest, thereby promoting safer environments in public recreational facilities. The presence of AEDs can significantly improve survival rates from such medical emergencies and is part of a wider effort to make public places safer for all residents and visitors.

Summary

Bill S0475, known as the David Casey Act, mandates that all public or private golf courses in the state are required to have an automated external defibrillator (AED) on the premises. The legislation aims to enhance public safety by ensuring that lifesaving equipment is readily available in recreational areas where large gatherings occur. This purpose aligns with broader public health initiatives to improve emergency response capabilities in various environments.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding Bill S0475 appears to be supportive, particularly among proponents of public health and safety. Advocates argue that having AEDs accessible in golf courses could potentially save lives during emergencies. While there may be concerns about the costs associated with acquiring and maintaining these devices, the overall consensus views this initiative as a positive step towards enhancing safety standards in recreational spaces.

Contention

Notable points of contention may include discussions around the financial implications of the bill, such as the costs of purchasing, maintaining, and training staff or volunteers to use the AEDs at golf courses. Some critics might argue that there should be a more comprehensive approach to health and safety legislation rather than piecemeal regulations that target specific facilities. However, supporters contend that the immediate presence of such devices in high-traffic areas like golf courses is essential for timely emergency response.