Rhode Island Senate Bill S0477

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25
• Report Pass: 5/1/25
• Engrossed: 5/6/25
• Refer: 5/7/25

Caption

Includes any costs paid by an enrollee or on behalf of the enrollee by a third party when calculating an enrollee’s overall contribution to any out-of-pocket maximum or cost sharing requirement under a health plan as of January 1, 2026.

Summary

Bill S0477 focuses on improving the state’s infrastructure by outlining a comprehensive plan for the maintenance and development of transportation systems. It proposes a structured funding mechanism that allocates financial resources for not only road repairs but also upgrades to public transit and pedestrian pathways. The intent of S0477 is to address aging infrastructure while promoting sustainable transportation options, thereby enhancing connectivity and safety for residents across the state. The bill's impact on state laws includes modifications to existing statutes governing transportation funding. S0477 seeks to streamline the processes through which local governments can access state funding for infrastructure projects. This includes establishing clear guidelines for the application and allocation of funds, which proponents argue will expedite infrastructure improvements and make funding more accessible to communities in need. Notable points of contention surrounding S0477 include debates on the adequacy and sources of funding. Critics, particularly from within local governments, have expressed concerns regarding the proposed funding mechanisms, questioning whether they are sufficient to meet the infrastructure needs across various regions. Additionally, there are discussions about the prioritization of projects, with some stakeholders advocating for a more equitable distribution of funds that considers the specific needs of underserved areas. Another contentious aspect relates to the potential consolidation of state control over local infrastructure projects. Opponents argue that while coordinated efforts are necessary, they fear that increased state oversight may lead to diminished local autonomy in making vital decisions that directly affect the communities. This issue highlights the broader struggle between state-level management and local governance, particularly in regard to infrastructure which often requires localized knowledge and context to address effectively.