Rhode Island Senate Bill S0566

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/26/25
• Refer: 2/26/25

Caption

Provides for a cause of action against an individual or entity that prohibits the possession of firearms on real property, except residences, by an individual that is authorized and licensed to carry a firearm.

Impact

If enacted, S0566 would significantly impact the legal landscape regarding firearm possession on private properties, particularly in settings outside of residential properties. It invites scrutiny of the balance between property rights and gun ownership rights by enabling individuals to hold property owners accountable for policies that limit firearm possession. The statute of limitations for bringing such claims is set at three years from the date of the incident, providing a defined window for affected individuals to seek legal recourse.

Summary

Bill S0566 is a legislative proposal that aims to establish a new civil cause of action for individuals who are authorized and licensed to carry firearms and suffer harm due to the prohibition of firearm possession on certain properties. Specifically, the bill stipulates that if such an individual is injured or incurs losses as a result of the prohibition, they may seek damages from the property owner. This provision underscores the bill's core intent to protect the rights of licensed gun owners, while also outlining the circumstances under which they can pursue legal action against property entities that impose such prohibitions.

Contention

The bill is likely to evoke contentious debates, especially considering the broader discussions around gun control and property rights. Proponents may argue that it protects the rights of lawful gun owners and encourages a more responsible approach to managing gun policies on private properties. Conversely, opponents may raise concerns about the implications for property owners who wish to enforce regulations that they believe are in the interest of safety. This could lead to disputes over liability and the extent to which gun rights should supersede property rights, potentially resulting in litigation and heightened tensions between gun rights advocates and property owners.