Rhode Island Senate Bill S0716

Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/25
• Refer: 3/7/25
• Report Pass: 6/2/25
• Passed: 6/27/25

Caption

Provides a procedure for parking modifications near shoreline rights of way.

Impact

The bill amends Chapter 46-23 of the General Laws concerning the Coastal Resources Management Council, creating a Shoreline Access Improvement Fund. The fund is designed to facilitate projects aimed at enhancing public access to the shoreline, with funds drawn from fines imposed for non-compliance with parking regulations. These changes promote a collective responsibility among cities, towns, and private entities to develop comprehensive parking plans that ensure no adverse effects on public access, particularly for disabled individuals.

Summary

S0716, introduced in the Rhode Island General Assembly, establishes a procedure for managing parking modifications near rights of way designated by the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC). The bill emphasizes the importance of maintaining public access to shorelines and ensures that any changes in parking availability are compliant with both state laws and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). It underlines the necessity of careful scrutiny over any substantive reductions in parking spaces to guarantee equitable shoreline access for all individuals, especially those with disabilities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding S0716 appears largely positive, especially among stakeholders invested in preservation and accessibility. Supporters argue that this bill is a significant step towards safeguarding shoreline access, which they consider a fundamental right. By implementing structured procedures for parking modifications and establishing a fund dedicated to improving accessibility, proponents believe it will foster a more inclusive environment for all residents and visitors.

Contention

Despite the positive aspects presented by supporters, some contention arose regarding the enforcement mechanisms and penalties for non-compliance. Entities found reducing parking availability without adhering to the outlined requirements face hefty fines and cease-and-desist orders. Critics may argue that stringent regulations and penalties could place burdens on local municipalities or private organizations. The balance between ensuring public access and supporting local governance presents an ongoing debate as the bill progresses through the legislative process.