South Dakota House Bill HB1273

South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/22
• Refer: 1/31/22
• Report Pass: 2/16/22
• Engrossed: 2/23/22
• Refer: 2/23/22
• Report Pass: 3/1/22
• Enrolled: 3/2/22
• Passed: 3/28/22

Caption

Authorize the Department of the Military to purchase certain real property in Chamberlain and to declare an emergency.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1273 will have a direct impact on state laws regarding property acquisition by government agencies, specifically aimed at enhancing the logistical capabilities of the Department of the Military. The bill facilitates the acquisition of land which is deemed essential for military operations, thus ensuring that military facilities can operate effectively and meet state and national defense needs. This move aligns with broader efforts to maintain and enhance the state’s military infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 1273 is an act that authorizes the Department of the Military in South Dakota to purchase a parcel of real property measuring approximately 0.66 acres, adjacent to the National Guard Field Maintenance Shop located in Chamberlain. The bill includes a specific maximum purchase price of $105,000, which is complemented by provision for up to $2,000 in closing costs. This acquisition is intended to support state government operations and its existing public institutions, particularly the military's needs in South Dakota.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1273 is largely positive, with bipartisan support seen during the legislative discussions. The bill was passed unanimously in the House, indicating that lawmakers recognize the importance of bolstering military capabilities via necessary real estate acquisitions. This consensus reflects a common understanding of the military's role in serving state interests, as well as an acknowledgment of the strategic necessity of land ownership near military operations.

Contention

While the bill did not appear to encounter significant opposition, there may be underlying concerns related to state property expenditures and the implications for the state's budget. Given that funds are allocated for this purchase, discussions could arise regarding fiscal responsibility and prioritization of military needs versus other state programs. Nevertheless, such concerns seemed to be overshadowed by the urgency and necessity of the bill's objectives.