South Dakota House Bill HB1284

South Dakota 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/22
• Refer: 2/2/22
• Report Pass: 2/10/22
• Engrossed: 2/15/22
• Refer: 2/16/22
• Report Pass: 2/25/22
• Enrolled: 3/1/22
• Passed: 3/28/22

Caption

Increase household income thresholds for a paraplegic tax reduction.

Impact

The modifications proposed by HB 1284 would potentially provide significant fiscal benefits to paraplegics by allowing more of them to qualify for reduced tax rates on their real property, thus decreasing their overall tax burden. By raising the income thresholds, the bill is positioned to help those who may be struggling to make ends meet due to the high costs associated with disabilities. This change could lead to an increased sense of financial security and stability among eligible populations.

Summary

House Bill 1284 is a legislative act aimed at increasing the household income thresholds for tax reductions available to paraplegics. The bill amends existing tax reduction provisions, establishing new income brackets that dictate the percentage of tax reductions on real property owed by paraplegics. Specifically, it increases the financial threshold at which individuals and households can receive reduced tax liabilities, thereby broadening access to financial relief for disabled individuals who meet the criteria.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding HB 1284 appears to be positive. The bill has received bipartisan support, as legislators recognize the importance of supporting individuals with disabilities. Supporters of the bill highlight the need for improved tax relief measures for vulnerable populations, particularly those with limited income due to their circumstances. There is a sense of consensus on the importance of ensuring that individuals with disabilities receive the financial support they need to live independent lives.

Contention

While the bill seems to enjoy broad support, some stakeholders have raised concerns about the potential impact of changing income thresholds on state revenue. Critics argue that increased tax reductions for a select group may lead to challenges in funding necessary state services. Additionally, discussions may arise around how the thresholds would be adjusted in future years to account for inflation or changes in living costs, ensuring the effectiveness of the relief offered. The balance between providing necessary support and maintaining state budgetary constraints remains a critical point of deliberation.