Require state agencies to provide certain information for initiated measure or constitutional amendment fiscal notes.
Impact
The passage of SB187 establishes a standardized process across various state agencies for reporting the financial implications of initiated measures. This is significant as it enhances transparency regarding how proposed initiatives might affect state budgets and resource allocations. It is expected to facilitate informed decision-making among legislators, stakeholders, and the public when considering such measures on the ballot. By ensuring that all agencies provide accurate and timely information, the bill aims to create a more accountable public policy environment.
Summary
Senate Bill 187 is a legislative measure from South Dakota that mandates state agencies to provide essential information needed for the preparation of fiscal notes related to initiated measures or constitutional amendments. This bill ensures that when a proposed initiative may impact state revenues, expenditures, or fiscal liability, the Legislative Research Council will prepare a fiscal note outlining these financial implications. The bill specifically instructs that this fiscal note must include an estimate of any effects on revenue and the state’s fiscal health as well as potential impacts on the prison or county jail population.
Sentiment
Overall sentiment towards SB187 has been positive, particularly among those who value fiscal transparency and accountability in government dealings. Supporters argue that this bill will streamline the process of evaluating the financial implications of new initiatives, making it easier for voters to understand how their decisions on ballot measures might affect the state’s financial health. Some critics have raised concerns regarding the administrative burden it may impose on state agencies; however, these voices are relatively minimal compared to the support for the increased oversight this bill promotes.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding SB187 was the balance between the efficiency of the legislative process and the need for comprehensive fiscal assessments. Some opponents expressed fears that increased bureaucracy could delay the assessment process for initiatives aimed at addressing urgent issues. Nevertheless, the bill sponsors argue that the benefits of thorough financial analysis outweigh these concerns, asserting that better informed voters lead to better policy outcomes.
Concerning The Development And Presentation Of Fiscal Impact Statements Concerning The Fiscal Impact Of Statewide Initiative And Referendum Measures And Legislatively Referred Constitutional Amendments.
Provides for initiative measures for use by the electorate to propose and adopt or reject laws and constitutional amendments. (2/3 - CA13s1(A)) (OR INCREASE GF EX See Note)
Require that the director of the Legislative Research Council and the secretary of state review an initiated measure and determine if the measure embraces more than one subject.