South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB51

Introduced
1/10/23  
Refer
1/11/23  
Report Pass
1/24/23  
Engrossed
1/25/23  
Refer
1/26/23  
Report Pass
2/9/23  
Refer
2/13/23  
Report Pass
3/1/23  
Enrolled
3/6/23  

Caption

Revise certain provisions regarding the reimbursement of county expenses in detaining parole violators.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts local governments and their budgeting for criminal justice expenditures. By formalizing the reimbursement structure, counties can expect a more predictable financial arrangement for handling parole violations. However, the limitation on reimbursement might push some counties to revise their policies on detaining parole violators, as they will have to carefully assess the financial implications of these detentions. The requirement for counties to present claims to the state auditor also establishes a checks-and-balances mechanism that aims to ensure only valid claims are reimbursed.

Summary

Senate Bill 51 aims to amend the existing provisions regarding the reimbursement of county expenses associated with the detention of parole violators in South Dakota. Under this bill, the state will reimburse counties a maximum of ninety-five dollars per day for each parolee detained, with provisions ensuring that counties cannot claim reimbursement for costs related to detaining parolees for unrelated criminal charges. The goal of this legislation is to streamline the reimbursement process and clarify the financial responsibilities of the state and counties regarding parole violators.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB51 appears to be generally positive, as it addresses a specific need within the state’s criminal justice system. Legislators supporting the bill emphasize the importance of clarifying and expediting reimbursement processes to alleviate the financial burdens on counties. However, there may be dissent from those concerned about the capped reimbursement amount, as it could lead to heightened financial strain on smaller counties that struggle with higher detention costs.

Contention

While debate over SB51 seems limited in the available records, potential points of contention could arise regarding the sufficiency of the reimbursement rate. Concerns may be voiced about whether the maximum reimbursement of ninety-five dollars per day adequately covers the actual detention costs incurred by counties. Additionally, some stakeholders may argue that the restriction on reimbursement for unrelated criminal charges could potentially discourage counties from detaining parole violators who might pose a risk to the community.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD SB140

Revise a provision related to the reimbursement of expenses incurred by a county in detaining a parolee.

SD HB1060

Revise certain provisions related to travel reimbursement.

SD HB1153

Update travel expenses, moving expenses, and other reimbursements.

SD HB1038

Revise certain provisions pertaining to the Department of Veterans Affairs and residency in the State Veterans Home.

SD SB37

Revise provisions regarding repair and maintenance of mail routes.

SD SB199

Revise provisions pertaining to the consolidation or boundary changes of counties.

SD HB1132

Revise certain provisions pertaining to municipal government.

SD SB52

Update certain provisions regarding the Department of Corrections and the authority of the Secretary of Corrections.

SD SB17

Revise provisions regarding cost reimbursement associated with medical cannabis.

SD HB1215

Revise certain provisions regarding the operation of a golf cart on a state or county highway.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.