South Dakota Senate Bill SB92

South Dakota 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/23
• Refer: 1/24/23
• Report Pass: 1/31/23
• Engrossed: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Report Pass: 2/9/23
• Enrolled: 2/14/23
• Passed: 2/28/23

Caption

Require that certain operations obtain their own general or individual water pollution permits.

Impact

The impact of SB92 will be significant in terms of state regulations concerning agricultural practices and environmental protection. CAFOs that process or store manure and wastewater will now be mandated to secure permits, leading to stricter monitoring and adherence to environmental guidelines. This change is designed to safeguard water resources from contamination and improve overall compliance with federal standards. The legislation not only enhances local environmental protections but also aligns state laws with federal regulations as defined under the Clean Water Act.

Summary

Senate Bill 92 seeks to amend existing regulations concerning concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in South Dakota by requiring these operations to obtain their own general or individual water pollution permits. This legislation is aimed at addressing environmental concerns associated with the handling of manure and process wastewater, ensuring that operations comply with set standards for water quality. By requiring permits, SB92 intends to hold such operations accountable and reduce the potential for water pollution due to inadequately managed waste disposal practices.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB92 appears to be generally supportive from environmental advocates and regulatory bodies, who view it as a necessary measure to fortify state water quality standards against pollution from agricultural operations. However, it may create concerns among some agricultural producers who might perceive the permitting process as an additional regulatory burden. The discussions leading to the bill illuminated a conflict between agricultural operational flexibility and the pressing need for environmental stewardship.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to SB92 center on the balance between regulatory compliance and the economic implications for farmers. Opponents argue that additional permitting requirements may impose financial and logistical challenges on small operations, while supporters assert that these regulations are essential for protecting public health and the environment. As the bill moves forward, ongoing conversations will likely address how best to implement the permitting process without stifling agricultural productivity.