South Dakota House Bill HB1184

South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Refer: 2/2/24
• Report Pass: 2/23/24

Caption

Require the Department of Social Services and the Department of Education to apply for and administer the summer electronic benefit transfer for children program and to make an appropriation therefor.

Impact

The bill's approval would enhance the support structure for children facing food insecurity in the state, particularly during summer breaks. By allocating $150,000 from the general fund and over $28.9 million in federal fund expenditure authority, the legislation underscores a significant investment in child welfare through nutritional assistance. This initiative is expected to mitigate the economic impacts on families by ensuring children receive necessary meals when school is not in session, thereby promoting better health and well-being among vulnerable populations.

Summary

House Bill 1184 aims to establish and manage a summer electronic benefit transfer program for children in South Dakota, to be administered jointly by the Department of Social Services and the Department of Education. The bill mandates that these departments apply for participation in this federal program, which is designed to provide nutritional support to children during the summer months when school meals are not available. This initiative is set to run from the summer of 2025 through 2029, leveraging funds from both the general and federal resources to facilitate its implementation.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards HB 1184 appears positive, with support stemming from a recognition of the need for adequate nutritional assistance for children during summer months. Proponents argue that the funding and structure provided by the bill will alleviate hunger and support better educational outcomes by ensuring that children are not at risk of going without meals. However, potential concerns may arise regarding the management of funds and the effectiveness of distribution mechanisms, which will require careful oversight and planning.

Contention

One notable point of contention may revolve around the allocation of funding and the accountability of both departments involved in the bill's execution. Stakeholders might raise questions about the efficacy of assistance programs and whether the funds will be managed efficiently. Additionally, discussions around the scope of the program may touch on whether all eligible children may be reached effectively and how the program's success will be measured against its stated goals. Ensuring that the plan meets the specific needs of communities could be a critical factor in ongoing discussions.