South Dakota House Bill HCR6006

South Dakota 2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/24
• Engrossed: 1/17/24
• Refer: 1/18/24
• Enrolled: 1/22/24
• Enrolled: 1/23/24

Caption

Urging the members of South Dakota's congressional delegation to sponsor and support an amendment to the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Act.

Impact

The resolution highlights the particular financial challenges faced by local governments in South Dakota due to the presence of federal lands, especially those under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. These lands often lead to reduced property tax revenues, making it difficult for local governments to maintain road systems necessary for public access. The recommendation for an amendment to the PILT Act aims to ensure that U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service lands are included in the calculation for these payments, thereby potentially increasing funding for local government services.

Summary

House Concurrent Resolution 6006 (HCR6006) urges South Dakota's congressional delegation to sponsor and support an amendment to the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Act. Originally enacted in 1976, the PILT Act provides annual payments to local governments intended to offset losses in property taxes from federal lands. The resolution emphasizes the significant role local governments play in providing services and maintaining infrastructure that supports national lands, particularly in areas of safety and accessibility to these lands.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HCR6006 appears supportive, as it addresses a crucial funding issue for local governments affected by untaxable federal lands. Legislators expressed positive views on the resolution, underscoring the need for equitable compensation for the taxes that local communities forfeit due to the presence of federal lands. This indicates a united front from South Dakota's lawmakers advocating for better support for their constituents who live in rural and often less economically vibrant areas.

Contention

While HCR6006 itself may not have contained explicit points of contention, the underlying implications of changing the PILT Act could spark debate regarding federal accountability in supporting local government needs. There could be concerns regarding the federal government's capacity to provide increased funding or how such changes may influence future allocations and resource management for both local and national priorities.