Tennessee House Bill HB0119

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/20/23
• Refer: 3/1/23
• Refer: 3/8/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 70, relative to hunting.

Impact

The provisions of HB 0119 are expected to significantly change how elk hunting permits are allocated in Tennessee. By establishing a preference pool, the bill aims to reward repeat applicants who have been qualifying for permits but haven't been drawn in the past, thereby increasing their chances in future permit draws. This is a move to enhance public interest in wildlife management and conservation efforts, ultimately aiming to maintain sustainable elk populations while promoting responsible hunting practices.

Summary

House Bill 0119 proposes an amendment to the Tennessee Code Annotated, particularly focusing on hunting regulations. The bill introduces a new quota system for elk hunt permits, dividing permits into two pools: a preference pool and an open pool. Half of the permits will be drawn from the preference pool based on preference points accumulated by applicants over the years, while the other half will be drawn from the open pool, ensuring a fair chance for all individuals who qualify and apply for a permit. Additionally, this bill establishes a non-refundable application fee of $10 for individuals who seek to apply for a quota elk hunt permit, while waiving fees for the actual permits.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 0119 appears to be generally positive among hunting advocates and wildlife conservationists, who view the new quota system as a fairer method for distributing hunting permits. However, there may be some concerns regarding the decision to implement preference points collecting, which could lead to frustration among new applicants who might feel disadvantaged compared to those with accumulated points. Overall, the discussion reveals a desire to balance accessibility to hunting opportunities with the conservation needs of the elk population.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the bill's implementation, particularly concerning the fairness of the preference point system. Some voices in the community express concerns that such a system might inadvertently create inequity in access to hunting permits. Furthermore, while establishing a management fund solely for elk management, questions arise on how effectively the funds will be utilized and monitored, ensuring that the resources dedicated to elk conservation translate into impactful outcomes.