Tennessee House Bill HB0120

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/20/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 17, relative to firearms.

Impact

The bill's amendments suggest a significant shift in how firearms are legally perceived in Tennessee. With the modification of terms, the bill aims to standardize the language used in the state's laws concerning firearms, which could lead to uniformity in enforcement. The passage of this bill means that the regulations no longer differentiate between handguns and other types of firearms, which could influence both law enforcement practices and individual rights concerning carrying firearms in public.

Summary

House Bill 120, introduced by Richey, seeks to amend specific sections of the Tennessee Code related to firearms. Notably, it involves changing the terminology from 'handgun' to 'firearm' in various provisions to expand the scope of regulations covering firearms beyond just handguns. This change reflects a broader interpretation of the law concerning the carrying and legality of firearms within the state, which could potentially impact individuals' rights to carry different types of firearms.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 120 appears to lean towards increased freedom for individuals carrying firearms, aligning with pro-gun advocacy perspectives. Support for the bill emphasizes a clarity and consistency in the law that is perceived as beneficial for adult citizens seeking to exercise their rights. However, there may be concerns from groups advocating for stricter gun control who argue that such changes could weaken regulations intended to ensure public safety.

Contention

Debate around HB 120 has underscored the tensions between those advocating for more relaxed firearm laws versus those concerned about gun safety. Proponents argue it clarifies the law, while opponents may criticize it for not addressing potential risks associated with broader firearm access. The ability to legally carry various types of firearms without stringent regulations raises questions about public safety and the responsibilities that come with firearm ownership. How this bill will affect future legislation on firearms regulation remains a point of contention in the ongoing debate over gun rights in the state.