Tennessee House Bill HB0190

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/23
• Refer: 1/21/23
• Refer: 2/28/23
• Refer: 3/8/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, relative to firearms.

Impact

This bill's passage would modify existing laws about the signage requirements for firearm prohibition in public and private spaces. It mandates that signs must be prominently displayed, adhering to specific dimensions and color schemes, aiming to make the restrictions clear to all entrants. Additionally, it grants a transitional period for existing signage to comply with these new standards, with a deadline set for July 1, 2024, facilitating a smoother adjustment for property owners.

Summary

House Bill 0190 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, which pertains to firearms and the regulations surrounding them. The bill primarily focuses on the manner in which prohibition signs related to firearms must be displayed on properties. It establishes stricter requirements regarding the size, visibility, and location of these signs, ensuring that they are easily noticeable by individuals entering a property where ownership has chosen to restrict firearm possession.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding HB 0190 is likely divided along lines typically associated with firearm legislation. Proponents argue that clearer signage about restrictions could enhance safety by ensuring individuals are aware of the rules before entering an area. Conversely, opponents may view the bill as an unnecessary layer of regulation or as infringing on property rights, potentially creating friction in discussions about personal freedoms in relation to firearm ownership.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 0190 would likely center on the implications of enforcing stricter signage laws. Supporters may contend that it is crucial for reducing accidental offenses regarding firearm possession in restricted areas. Opponents might raise concerns about the bill's potential to impose unreasonable burdens on property owners and the possibility of heightened scrutiny concerning compliance. Such debates encapsulate a broader national conversation about firearm regulation and the balance between safety and personal liberty.