Tennessee House Bill HB0357

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68 and Title 71, relative to health care.

Impact

The legislative discussions surrounding HB 0357 appear to revolve around the implications of this amendment on healthcare practices and policies in Tennessee. By reducing the specified time frame, proponents of the bill may argue that it prompts quicker responses from agencies involved in health services and benefits management. This change could potentially facilitate faster services, thus impacting the operational effectiveness of healthcare providers and state agencies responsible for managing healthcare programs.

Summary

House Bill 0357 aims to amend Sections 68 and 71 of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting healthcare provisions. The bill proposes to change a specific time frame from thirty (30) days to fifteen (15) days in Section 71-5-110(c)(1), which likely relates to regulations surrounding healthcare programs. This adjustment is positioned as a means to streamline processes within the healthcare sector, suggesting a focus on efficiency and responsiveness in state healthcare administration.

Sentiment

The reception of HB 0357 within the legislative framework seems to reflect a largely supportive sentiment from those advocating for streamlined health care processes. Proponents might view this bill as a necessary step towards improving the efficiency of administrative action in healthcare. However, any opposition primarily concerns the implications of such a change on stakeholders within the healthcare ecosystem, as reduced time frames may pressure these entities to comply without consistent oversight.

Contention

The notable point of contention surrounding HB 0357 lies in the balance between making healthcare access more efficient versus ensuring thorough oversight and compliance. Critics might be concerned that hastening procedures could lead to oversight lapses or inadequate responses to various stakeholder needs. This tension between speed and quality of healthcare administration may provoke further debate among legislators and stakeholders, influencing the bill's reception and potential amendments.