Tennessee House Bill HB0394

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Refer: 3/7/23
• Refer: 3/29/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Refer: 4/12/23
• Refer: 4/18/23
• Engrossed: 4/20/23
• Enrolled: 4/26/23
• Passed: 5/11/23
• Chaptered: 6/2/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 10; Title 29; Title 39; Title 43; Title 44; Title 53 and Title 68, relative to inspection programs.

Impact

If enacted, HB 394 would significantly reshape how meat inspection operates within Tennessee. The bill designates the commissioner of agriculture as the key authority responsible for the meat inspection program and grants them the ability to promulgate rules and appoint necessary personnel. Additionally, the bill mandates that Tennessee's inspection standards shall be at least equal to those imposed by federal legislation, effectively aligning state regulations with federal guidelines to facilitate compliance and interstate commerce.

Summary

House Bill 394 seeks to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated to implement a state meat inspection program. This bill aims to establish and enforce standards for meat and poultry products by transferring significant regulatory authority to the state, allowing for inspections that comply with both state and federal standards. The legislation emphasizes the importance of food safety and seeks to create a robust inspection program within the Tennessee Department of Agriculture, ensuring that meat products meet rigorous safety guidelines.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 394 appears to be supportive, particularly within agricultural and food safety circles. Advocates argue that establishing a state meat inspection program is essential for protecting public health and ensuring consumer confidence in meat products. However, there may also be apprehensions regarding the financial implications of implementing a new state program and the adequacy of resources allocated for inspections.

Contention

A notable point of contention with HB 394 could hinge on the degree of authority given to the state versus local entities. The bill explicitly restricts local health boards from regulating aspects of meat inspection, which could lead to concerns from local governments about diminishing their regulatory capabilities. Stakeholders may debate the balance of centralized state control against local health needs, especially when it comes to food safety practices tailored to local contexts.