Tennessee House Bill HB0483

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/15/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Chaptered: 3/23/23
• Passed: 3/23/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 7-51-2102, relative to energy sources.

Impact

The implications of HB 0483 are significant as it centralizes regulatory authority concerning energy sources at the state level, potentially limiting local governments' ability to tailor energy policies to suit their specific needs. This bill could lead to broader acceptance and integration of various energy sources by removing local barriers to utility access. If enacted, the law would align energy policies more closely with state-level regulations, prioritizing consistency over localized governance.

Summary

House Bill 0483 proposes amendments to Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Section 7-51-2102, concerning regulations on energy sources. The bill seeks to prevent local governmental subdivisions from adopting policies that could hinder the connection or reconnection of utility services based on the type or source of energy. Additionally, it aims to ensure that such local governments cannot impose restrictions on the sale or installation of any appliances used for purposes like cooking or heating, thereby promoting a more uniform approach to energy-related policies across the state.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB 0483 have revealed a spectrum of sentiments from stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill supports energy accessibility and modernization, crucially benefiting consumers by preventing local constraints on utility services. However, critics express concern regarding the loss of local autonomy, fearing that this legislation could undermine local initiatives geared towards sustainability and community-specific energy solutions, thereby engendering a contentious debate between state control and local self-determination.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between ensuring energy availability and acknowledging local jurisdictions' discretion in regulating community standards. Opponents highlight the potential adverse effects on local initiatives aimed at promoting renewable energy sources or enhancing energy efficiency standards that respond to unique regional considerations. The tension in these discussions underscores a significant conflict between state-level objectives and local governance capabilities, illustrating the complexities inherent in energy policy regulation.