Tennessee House Bill HB0565

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/23
• Refer: 2/1/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 48 and Title 67, relative to real property taxes.

Impact

If passed, HB 565 would significantly affect how local governments manage property tax increases. By requiring a referendum for any tax rate increase that exceeds specified thresholds, the bill aims to enhance fiscal responsibility among local authorities. It could lead to a more standardized approach to tax increases across municipalities in Tennessee. However, the bill also implies that local governments may struggle with funding essential services or projects reliant on increased revenue, potentially stifling local initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 565 seeks to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding real property taxes. The bill introduces provisions that limit the ability of local governments to increase real property tax rates unless they seek approval through a referendum. Specifically, local governments are restricted from increasing total revenue from property taxes by an amount exceeding inflation plus two percent annually, or more than inflation plus six percent over any three-year period. This measure is designed to provide a check on local government taxation powers in the interest of homeowners and the economic standing of communities.

Conclusion

In summary, HB 565 represents a critical examination of local taxation authority in Tennessee, balancing the need for fiscal restraint with the principles of local governance. The upcoming discussions and votes will likely reveal a divide between those prioritizing taxpayer protection and those advocating for local government's ability to self-determine funding mechanisms.

Contention

Notably, there is potential contention surrounding HB 565 regarding local autonomy and governance. Proponents argue that the bill is necessary to protect residents from excessive taxation and promote fiscal conservatism. Conversely, opponents contend that it undermines local control, preventing governments from responding effectively to the specific financial needs of their communities. The requirement for referendums could also complicate and delay necessary funding measures, particularly in times of economic change.