Tennessee House Bill HB0685

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/26/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Refer: 3/15/23
• Refer: 3/28/23
• Engrossed: 4/13/23
• Enrolled: 4/28/23
• Passed: 5/11/23
• Chaptered: 5/19/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 54 and Title 55, relative to highway safety.

Impact

The impact of HB 0685 on state laws could be significant, as it seeks to integrate safety evaluations related to pedestrian and bicycle traffic into existing transportation policies. By emphasizing data-driven assessments of risky locations, the bill is designed to alert local governments to safety deficiencies and encourage the implementation of effective solutions. It aims to create a structured approach by bringing together transportation officials, law enforcement, and local authorities to tackle these issues collectively.

Summary

House Bill 0685 aims to enhance highway safety in Tennessee by requiring the department of transportation to identify locations with elevated injuries to bicyclists and pedestrians. The bill mandates a comprehensive report that will detail findings and recommendations for a strategic statewide plan to address these safety issues. This initiative reflects a growing concern for improving safety measures for vulnerable road users and aims to mitigate the occurrences of dangerous incidents.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 0685 appears to be positive, as the bill is intended to improve public safety and address concerns regarding pedestrian and bicycle-related accidents. Supporters of the bill view it as a crucial step towards fostering safer communities and promoting active transportation modes. However, some stakeholders may express caution regarding the implementation of the proposed solutions, emphasizing the need for adequate resources and community involvement in the development of safety plans.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 0685 may focus on the effectiveness and scope of the strategies outlined in the report. Discussions might arise around the prioritization of resources for high-risk areas, potential resistance from local governments regarding mandates from the state, and the need for further funding or support for community engagement in the safety planning process. The balance between state oversight and local autonomy in addressing these critical issues will likely be central to discussions as the bill progresses.