Tennessee House Bill HB0766

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Refer: 3/28/23
• Refer: 4/3/23
• Engrossed: 4/18/23
• Enrolled: 4/24/23
• Passed: 5/11/23
• Chaptered: 5/19/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 54 and Title 55, relative to traffic-control signals.

Impact

The implications of HB 766 on state law are notable, particularly regarding the control and regulation of traffic signals across Tennessee. By reinforcing the minimum yellow light duration and tying it to engineering standards, the bill intends to reduce instances of traffic violations that could be perceived as a result of deliberately shortened yellow light durations, particularly where surveillance cameras are used. This could potentially lead to reductions in unfair traffic fines and enhance road safety for both drivers and pedestrians.

Summary

House Bill 766 is an act designed to amend existing laws in Tennessee concerning traffic-control signals, specifically addressing the duration of yellow lights at intersections. The bill establishes that the minimum time exposure for a yellow light remains set at three seconds. Moreover, it mandates that the timing control for such traffic signals adhere to engineering practices as specified in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). This is aimed at improving safety at intersections and ensuring that traffic signals function in a manner consistent with established standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 766 appears to be largely positive among those advocating for road safety and fair traffic enforcement practices. Supporters argue that longer yellow light durations can lead to smoother traffic flow and reduced accidents. However, there is cautious sentiment regarding the effectiveness of enforcement practices involving surveillance cameras, with some critics voicing concerns about privacy and the potential for abuse of these systems to generate revenue rather than promote safety.

Contention

Despite the overall support for the bill, contention remains, particularly regarding the role of surveillance cameras in traffic enforcement. Critics of automated enforcement argue that it can lead to a lack of accountability and transparency in the issuance of fines. Additionally, there is ongoing debate about the appropriateness of engineering standards and their application at local levels, with some lawmakers advocating for more localized control and discretion in traffic management.