Tennessee House Bill HB1011

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 3/7/23
• Refer: 3/12/24
• Refer: 3/20/24
• Refer: 3/25/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4 and Title 68, relative to the department of environment and conservation.

Impact

The implications of HB1011 are significant for state laws regarding environmental reporting and conservation efforts. By enabling electronic submissions, the bill can facilitate quicker access to information by regulatory agencies and the public. This adjustment may also result in cost savings for the state by reducing the need for physical documentation and improving data collection methodologies. Overall, the bill is seen as a step towards updating the existing framework governing environmental conservation to better fit contemporary technological norms.

Summary

House Bill 1011 amends the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 4 and Title 68, to enhance reporting requirements for the Department of Environment and Conservation. The primary change allows reports to be submitted in electronic format, which signifies a move towards modernization and efficiency in reporting practices. This modernization is seen as a critical improvement to streamline processes and reduce the paperwork burden, potentially enabling better management and oversight of environmental issues within the state.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB1011 appears to be positive, as stakeholders recognize the necessity of updating traditional practices in favor of more efficient and effective methods of reporting. Supporters argue that the move to electronic reporting will promote transparency and accountability, as data will be more readily accessible. However, there may also be some concerns about the implications for data security and the need for adequate training for staff to adapt to the new system.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise from discussions surrounding the potential challenges of transitioning to electronic reporting. Critics may highlight initial costs involved in implementing new technology and training staff while expressing concerns about ensuring the integrity and security of electronically submitted information. Nonetheless, the overarching theme of the discussion is centered on the balance between modernization and the preservation of robust environmental oversight.