Tennessee House Bill HB1018

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 2/15/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Engrossed: 2/28/23
• Enrolled: 3/7/23
• Passed: 3/21/23
• Chaptered: 3/28/23

Caption

AN ACT, to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 70, relative to the Tennessee wildlife resources agency.

Impact

The impact of HB 1018 is expected to streamline the processes related to licensing for nonresidents while ensuring that the fees collected are appropriate for the maintenance and safeguarding of Tennessee's wildlife. By modifying the existing code, the bill aims to enhance regulatory measures that contribute to the effective management of wildlife resources. As such, it reinforces the authority of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency in overseeing hunting and fishing activities and guarantees that necessary funds are allocated for wildlife conservation efforts.

Summary

House Bill 1018 amends the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding regulations instituted by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency. The primary purpose of the bill is to adjust fees that nonresident hunters, fishers, and trappers are required to pay to participate in these activities within the state. Additionally, the bill establishes requirements for the provision of accurate information on licenses and permits, ensuring compliance with agency regulations and enhancing the ability of regulatory bodies to manage wildlife resources effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1018 appears predominantly positive, with support from legislative members who believe that these changes are essential for balancing the needs of wildlife management and the interests of recreational users. The bill passed with unanimous support in the House, indicating a strong consensus on the necessity of these amendments. Many advocates for the bill emphasize its potential to ensure responsible wildlife management and conservation while accommodating nonresident participants in hunting and fishing.

Contention

Despite the clear approval of the bill, potential points of contention may arise regarding the specific fee structures and the requirement for nonresidents to provide detailed information for compliance. While the intention is to improve management and conservation, concerns could be raised by individuals regarding the financial burden of these fees and the privacy of their information in compliance processes. Additionally, the balance between resource management and accessibility for nonresident hunters and fishers may be a topic of ongoing discussion.