Tennessee House Bill HB1066

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, relative to broadband.

Impact

The implications of HB 1066 are significant for stakeholders in the broadband industry, as well as for consumers reliant on internet services. By reducing the timeframes involved in regulatory processes, the bill could foster a more responsive and timely approach to the development and improvement of broadband infrastructure. This aligns with statewide initiatives to improve connectivity, especially in underserved areas where access to reliable internet services is crucial for economic and educational opportunities.

Summary

House Bill 1066 aims to amend a specific section of the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning the deadlines associated with broadband service regulations. The bill proposes to change the current timeframe for certain processes from 'thirty (30) business days' to 'thirty (30) calendar days'. This adjustment is intended to streamline procedures and possibly expedite the deployment of broadband services across the state. As broadband access continues to be a pivotal issue for communities, this amendment reflects an effort to enhance the efficiency of administrative operations within this sector.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1066 is largely positive among proponents who view the bill as a necessary step towards improving broadband access in Tennessee. Advocates argue that by modifying the timeframe for regulations, the state can better meet the demands of a growing digital economy. However, there may be concerns among some legislative members about the implications this rapid change could have on oversight and the thoroughness of the processes involved in granting permissions for new broadband developments.

Contention

While there appears to be general support for the intent of the bill, notable points of contention may arise regarding the adequacy of the change from business to calendar days. Critics could argue that hastening processes might overlook important regulatory considerations that ensure fair and effective broadband service deployment. Discussions within legislative sessions are likely to reflect these concerns and further debate the balance between efficient service expansion and maintaining sufficient regulatory safeguards.