Tennessee House Bill HB1107

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 4/17/23
• Engrossed: 4/19/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4 and Title 49, relative to Tennessee State University.

Impact

The enactment of HB1107 would have implications for state laws concerning the governance and oversight of higher education institutions in Tennessee. By instituting an annual reporting requirement, the bill is designed to foster a structured approach to assessing TSU's infrastructure needs over time. This will not only facilitate better planning and resource allocation but may also contribute to enhancing the quality of education and facilities provided at TSU, ensuring that it meets modern educational standards and student needs.

Summary

House Bill 1107 seeks to amend specific sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated pertaining to Tennessee State University (TSU) by mandating a systematic evaluation of its facilities and infrastructure. Under this bill, TSU is required to submit an annual report to the governor and the General Assembly, detailing the improvements made to its facilities, as well as how these enhancements address the needs identified by the Tennessee higher education commission. This provision is aimed at ensuring transparency and accountability in the allocation of resources toward improving the university's infrastructure.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB1107 appears to be largely positive, as it addresses significant concerns related to the condition of university facilities. Supporters, including legislative members and educational advocates, view the bill as a proactive step toward ensuring that TSU can effectively communicate its infrastructure requirements and progress. This transparency is seen as vital for garnering support and funding necessary for continued improvements, which is generally well-received within the community.

Contention

While the bill is perceived positively by many, some concerns may arise regarding its implementation and the potential bureaucratic layers it introduces. Legislators may debate the adequacy of the reporting requirements, questioning whether they provide sufficient detail or frequency to genuinely reflect the needs of the university. Moreover, the necessity of the amendments may be a contentious point, as funding for higher education institutions is often a hot-button issue, influencing how representatives prioritize educational improvements against other state needs.