Tennessee House Bill HB1375

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/2/23
• Refer: 3/14/23
• Refer: 3/22/23
• Refer: 2/26/24
• Refer: 3/6/24
• Refer: 3/12/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24
• Passed: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, relative to the Tennessee historical commission.

Impact

The proposed changes are expected to enhance the operational effectiveness of the Tennessee Historical Commission by bringing in new members who meet specific criteria related to age and academic qualifications. The appointments will be staggered to maintain continuity while allowing fresh perspectives to inform the commission's activities, which focus on preserving and promoting Tennessee's historical and cultural heritage. The bill also sets out to ensure that the commission remains inclusive and representative of the state's diverse population.

Summary

House Bill 1375 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, focusing on the restructuring and governance of the Tennessee Historical Commission. The bill proposes to vacate the current membership of the commission as of July 1, 2024, and establish new appointments that strive for diversity in the commission's representation. This includes the appointment of members from different geographic divisions of the state as well as ensuring representation from minorities and those with relevant academic backgrounds in history or historic preservation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1375 appears to be predominantly positive among supporters who believe that the restructured commission will be more effective in its mission. There is a recognition of the importance of diversity and appropriate expertise in fostering a deeper understanding of Tennessee's history. However, there may be concerns regarding the efficacy of the transition process and how the changes will be implemented, particularly regarding the quick turnover of members and the potential impacts on ongoing commission projects.

Contention

Some points of contention in the discussions about HB 1375 may revolve around the criteria set for appointments and the potential for political influence in selecting commission members. There could be apprehensions about how the new appointments will align with existing historical projects and initiatives, as well as worries about whether the commission can function successfully during the transition period. The bill may also raise questions about maintaining the historical integrity of the commission amidst the restructuring.