Tennessee House Bill HB1587

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/20/23
• Refer: 4/20/23
• Refer: 1/10/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 47 and Title 68, relative to firearms.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1587 results in a direct alteration to Tennessee's existing firearm legislation, specifically within the context of the manufacturing sector. This change signifies an added layer of regulation that may influence gun manufacturers and local businesses involved in firearm production, potentially altering the landscape of firearm availability within the state. Additionally, the bill seeks to address public safety concerns by controlling the types and quantities of firearms that can be produced, which may resonate with certain advocacy groups focused on gun control.

Summary

House Bill 1587 introduces significant amendments to Tennessee's firearms laws, specifically concerning the manufacturing of semi-automatic rifles. By defining a semi-automatic rifle and establishing that the manufacturing of such firearms is an offense, this legislation clearly reflects an initiative to regulate gun production within the state. This bill categorizes the offense as a Class A misdemeanor, introducing potential repercussions for non-compliance that could include fines and/or imprisonment for violators.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1587 appears to be mixed, with advocates who support stricter gun regulations viewing the bill positively as a protective measure for public safety. However, there has also been notable opposition from certain groups, including gun rights advocates, who argue that such regulations infringe upon Second Amendment rights. This division highlights a larger national debate regarding gun control and the balance between safety and personal freedoms.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the classification of semi-automatic rifles and the broader implications for gun rights in Tennessee. Critics are concerned that the bill's provisions could set a precedent for further restrictions on firearm ownership and manufacturing, while supporters assert that the regulation is necessary for safety. The classification as a Class A misdemeanor adds to the contentious nature of the bill, provoking discussions on appropriate penalties and the enforcement of firearm laws in the state.