Tennessee House Bill HB1654

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/8/24
• Refer: 1/10/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49 and Title 68, relative to school youth athletic activities.

Impact

The bill will amend existing Tennessee Code regarding school athletic activities, indicating a significant legislative step in prioritizing student safety in sports. By requiring each school to have an AED on-site and to prepare emergency action plans, HB1654 aims to create a standardized approach to managing health emergencies across the state’s high schools. This alignment is expected to reduce the risks associated with sports injuries, ultimately fostering a safer environment for student athletes. Furthermore, its success could serve as a precedent for similar legislation in other states, directly influencing public health and safety policies regarding youth sports.

Summary

House Bill 1654, also known as the 'Smart Heart Law,' aims to enhance the safety of students participating in youth athletic activities by mandating specific emergency response measures in schools. The bill requires that all public and nonpublic schools serving grades 9-12 maintain automated external defibrillators (AEDs) that are accessible during school hours and athletic events. Additionally, schools are mandated to establish and rehearse an Athletics Emergency Action Plan (AEAP), ensuring schools are prepared to respond effectively to serious or life-threatening injuries during athletic activities. The objective of the legislation is to improve the overall safety and preparedness of schools regarding medical emergencies that may occur during sports events involving students.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB1654 is predominantly positive, with support from various stakeholders including parents, school officials, and health professionals who recognize the importance of ensuring medical readiness during athletic events. By advocating for life-saving measures such as AEDs and CPR training, the bill reflects a growing emphasis on proactive health measures in schools. However, some concerns have been voiced regarding the financial implications for schools to acquire AEDs and implement training programs, with critics questioning whether sufficient funding will be allocated to support these requirements.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB1654 was the cost burden it may impose on schools, particularly smaller or underfunded districts that might struggle to meet the stated requirements. Some opponents argued that while the intentions behind the legislation are commendable, the practical implications of compliance could strain limited school budgets. Additionally, there were discussions regarding the adequacy of training for staff responsible for implementing the emergency action plans. Balancing the need for safety with the financial realities of school funding continues to be a key issue in the legislative discourse surrounding this bill.