Tennessee House Bill HB1714

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/11/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 36, Chapter 3, Part 6 and Title 39, relative to dispossession of firearms.

Impact

The impact of HB1714 on state laws is notably procedural, focusing on the administrative aspects of firearm dispossession. By formalizing the creation of affidavits and the process for their submission, the bill strengthens record-keeping and accountability in the state's handling of firearm dispossession cases. The bill also stipulates that the forms must be available through the courts and their administrative office, enhancing accessibility for those affected by the law. This aspect of the bill underscores a shift towards more structured documentation in legal proceedings relating to firearm dispossession.

Summary

House Bill 1714 is an amendment to the Tennessee Code Annotated focused on the process of firearm dispossession. Specifically, it alters procedures related to how defendants lawfully dispose of firearms after conviction. The bill mandates completion of an affidavit of firearms dispossession form and their subsequent submission to the court as a prerequisite for the lawful dispossession of firearms. This change intends to clarify and streamline the firearms dispossession process for convicted individuals, aiming to ensure compliance with legal stipulations surrounding firearm ownership following a felony conviction.

Contention

While the bill appears straightforward in its intent to clarify administrative procedures, it may face scrutiny regarding its implications for individuals with firearms and their rights post-conviction. Advocates for stricter firearm regulation may support the bill as a step toward ensuring that convicted individuals do not retain access to firearms. However, there may be concerns from civil liberties advocates about the potential burdens placed on the defendants in terms of compliance and the implications for their rights. Overall, the discussions surrounding the bill illustrate differing viewpoints on public safety and individual rights concerning firearm possession.