Tennessee House Bill HB1754

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/11/24
• Refer: 2/5/24
• Engrossed: 3/12/24
• Enrolled: 4/30/24
• Passed: 5/21/24
• Chaptered: 5/28/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 4, Chapter 3, relative to the department of general services.

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB1754 may lead to a more cohesive regulatory framework for the Department of General Services. By altering existing statutes, the bill seeks to redefine the departmental structure, which could result in enhanced operational capabilities. This shift could potentially lead to expedited services and improved responses to public sector needs, ultimately aiming to foster greater governmental efficiency in Tennessee.

Summary

House Bill 1754 is an act aimed at amending certain provisions within the Tennessee Code Annotated specifically related to the Department of General Services. The bill proposes changes to Sections 4-29-245 and 4-29-247, which govern the operations and structure of this department. The overarching goal of HB1754 appears to be centered on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the department by streamlining certain regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill seems to be generally supportive, focusing on reforms intended to modernize the Department of General Services. Legislative discussions indicate a recognition among lawmakers of the necessity for regulatory updates that can aid in providing better services to constituents. The absence of opposition during the voting process suggests a consensus on the benefits of the proposed changes.

Contention

While HB1754 has passed with unanimous support, it is important to note that any legislative change may provoke discussions concerning the balance of power within state agencies. Amendments to existing regulations might lead to scrutiny regarding the functioning of the Department of General Services and how its operations align with public expectations. Overall, though the debate was minimal, any substantial restructuring of government entities can raise conversations about accountability and oversight in state governance.