Tennessee House Bill HB1833

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/24/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 36-3-301, relative to persons who may solemnize marriages.

Impact

The passage of HB 1833 would expand the legal framework surrounding marriage solemnization in Tennessee. By allowing master Freemasons to officiate marriages, the bill seeks to accommodate the traditions of the Freemason community, thereby potentially enhancing their involvement in civil ceremonies. This change could result in more diverse options for couples seeking to get married, as they may prefer an official ceremony performed by someone from their own community or belief system.

Summary

House Bill 1833 proposes an amendment to Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 36-3-301, which pertains to individuals authorized to solemnize marriages. The amendment specifically adds 'master Freemasons' to the list of those who can perform marriage ceremonies, alongside notaries public. This inclusion acknowledges the role of Freemasons in officiating marriages, reflecting an expansion of the pool of authorized individuals for such ceremonies in Tennessee.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1833 appears to be generally supportive among its proponents, particularly within the Freemason community and those who value the inclusion of various traditions in marriage practices. However, there may also be criticism from segments of society that question the necessity or appropriateness of such expansions, particularly from those who advocate for more standardized or secular approaches to marriage solemnization. Overall, the reactions could vary based on cultural or religious perspectives.

Contention

While there does not appear to be substantial opposition to HB 1833 at this stage, the inclusion of additional categories of individuals who can solemnize marriages can sometimes spark debates about the separation of church and state. Critics might raise concerns regarding the implications of allowing religious or fraternal organizations to partake in civil marriage processes, which could touch upon broader discussions about the regulation of marriage in the state. Any future movements to further expand or restrict who can solemnize marriages could provoke more heated discussions.